Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:04:29 +0100 Extract functions to list expected/found database indexes from check_indexes 3.24
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Wed, 14 Dec 2016 17:04:29 +0100] rev 11893
Extract functions to list expected/found database indexes from check_indexes so they may be used from other contexts. Use consistent naming along the way: always use indexes, not indices.
Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:36:26 +0100 Simplify and fix _cw.drop_entity_cache
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Thu, 24 Nov 2016 15:36:26 +0100] rev 11892
Simplify and fix _cw.drop_entity_cache * it's never called with an eid as argument, beside in a useless case in test (removed) * the only place where it's called from outside the tests is in full-text reindexation in server.checkintegrity: we could removed the request implementation and move it in unittest_rset, byt I decided to keep it for consistency with all other entity cache handling methods * get back a fix from Julien Cristau for the connection's implementation, quoting is commit message: When removing an entity from the transaction's cache, clear the entity's own cache May avoid issues where an entity object is still accessible somewhere else (e.g. an operation) after dropping it from the transaction's cache, with a stale attribute or relation cache.
Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:50:56 +0100 [entity/optimization] Cache rset when entity.related is called with entities=False
Sylvain Thénault <sylvain.thenault@logilab.fr> [Fri, 18 Nov 2016 17:50:56 +0100] rev 11891
[entity/optimization] Cache rset when entity.related is called with entities=False If fail to see why we couldn't cache in this case, while this is important for optimization reason: when doing a single HTTP request, some queries are done two or three times because of predicates / uicfg or alike. Also always store tuple and not list in the cache, because: * else we get some regression * and inconsistent result type (tuple or list) * and it simply feels better to cache an unmutable object.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip