Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:38:04 +0200 obsfate: by default only display the username if differ from the current one
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:38:04 +0200] rev 2612
obsfate: by default only display the username if differ from the current one This will will keep the output simple in the simple case.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:03:32 +0200 obsfate: display more data about direct prune markers
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:03:32 +0200] rev 2611
obsfate: display more data about direct prune markers This does not handle all cases, but this should handle the most common ones.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:58:17 +0200 obsfate: split markers fetch from successor set annotation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:58:17 +0200] rev 2610
obsfate: split markers fetch from successor set annotation This will help to improve support for pruned changesets.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:55:55 +0200 obsfate: mark successorsetallmarkers public
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:55:55 +0200] rev 2609
obsfate: mark successorsetallmarkers public We are about to use it in another module.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:54:27 +0200 obsfate: mark 'preparesuccessorset' as public
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:54:27 +0200] rev 2608
obsfate: mark 'preparesuccessorset' as public It is used in another module so it is not really private.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:51:31 +0200 obsfate: use 'split' as verb when appropriate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:51:31 +0200] rev 2607
obsfate: use 'split' as verb when appropriate
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:50:11 +0200 obsfate: improve prune support in _successorsetverb
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:50:11 +0200] rev 2606
obsfate: improve prune support in _successorsetverb In the prune case, still have markers (at least the prune markers). If we want to be able to return these markers we need the underlying function to support it.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:37:03 +0200 obsfate: rename 'successorsset' to 'sset' in the loop
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:37:03 +0200] rev 2605
obsfate: rename 'successorsset' to 'sset' in the loop The old name make it too close to 'successorssets', and the shorter name is not ambiguous in the context anyway.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:42:28 +0200 template: use hex node in the obsmarkers used in the obsfate template
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:42:28 +0200] rev 2604
template: use hex node in the obsmarkers used in the obsfate template This was pointed by Yuya and yuya is right.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:34:02 +0200 template: use hex successors in obsfate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:34:02 +0200] rev 2603
template: use hex successors in obsfate This was spotted by Yuya.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:21:49 +0200 template: use hex-node in successors
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:21:49 +0200] rev 2602
template: use hex-node in successors AS pointed by yuya on the list, the raw data for the template should be hex and not binary.
Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:16:26 +0200 template: update successors doc
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:16:26 +0200] rev 2601
template: update successors doc I'm not very happy about it, but at lease there is a show description now
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 tip