Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:48:06 +0200 graft: avoid potential deadlock stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:48:06 +0200] rev 1256
graft: avoid potential deadlock We must acquire 'wlock' before 'lock'.
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:47:04 +0200 commit: avoid potential deadlock stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:47:04 +0200] rev 1255
commit: avoid potential deadlock We must acquire 'wlock' before 'lock'.
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:41:27 +0200 update readme stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:41:27 +0200] rev 1254
update readme
Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:36:12 +0200 pull: fix bundle2 part generation stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Mon, 20 Apr 2015 13:36:12 +0200] rev 1253
pull: fix bundle2 part generation The new part generator (allowing partial pull) was unproperly installed.
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:35:26 -0400 simple4server: cleanup debug output stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 11 Apr 2015 10:35:26 -0400] rev 1252
simple4server: cleanup debug output The debug output got duplicated with the original code. And the cleanup forgot about simple4serve. (code duplicated yeah!)
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:10:10 -0400 merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:10:10 -0400] rev 1251
merge with stable
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:09:12 -0400 update readme stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:09:12 -0400] rev 1250
update readme
Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:06:59 -0400 discovery: stop being stupid about variable name stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Sat, 11 Apr 2015 00:06:59 -0400] rev 1249
discovery: stop being stupid about variable name Overwritten variable are overwritten... The test coverage makes a simple pass in the loop :(
Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:48:23 -0400 merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:48:23 -0400] rev 1248
merge with stable
Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:16:10 -0400 inhibit: explicitly test for None
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Fri, 10 Apr 2015 23:16:10 -0400] rev 1247
inhibit: explicitly test for None It is always better to check for None explicitly.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip