Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:53 +0530 test-compat: merge mercurial-4.4 into mercurial-4.3 mercurial-4.3
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:53 +0530] rev 3818
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.4 into mercurial-4.3
Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:52 +0530 test-compat: merge mercurial-4.5 into mercurial-4.4 mercurial-4.4
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:52 +0530] rev 3817
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.5 into mercurial-4.4
Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:51 +0530 test-compat: merge stable into mercurial-4.5 mercurial-4.5
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 22:52:51 +0530] rev 3816
test-compat: merge stable into mercurial-4.5
Tue, 22 May 2018 23:51:57 +0530 utility: use ui.interactive() instead of checking config value stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 22 May 2018 23:51:57 +0530] rev 3815
utility: use ui.interactive() instead of checking config value Before this patch, the rev selection prompt which pops up in case of ambiguity to ask user to select a rev used to check the config value of ui.interactive which can is by default set to None. We should use ui.interactive() instead which is more smart in such cases. Thanks to martinvonz for suggesting this.
Fri, 08 Jun 2018 19:48:53 +0530 CHANGELOG: add couple of entries about things fixed stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 19:48:53 +0530] rev 3814
CHANGELOG: add couple of entries about things fixed We are preparing for a release!
Fri, 08 Jun 2018 17:36:28 +0530 next-prev: always respect the --merge flag stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 17:36:28 +0530] rev 3813
next-prev: always respect the --merge flag An earlier bug fix series which started respecting commands.update.check introduced a bug in which --merge was not respected sometimes. This patch fixes that behavior by passing updatecheck as 'none' to hg.updatetotally() if --merge is passed which is similar to what `hg update` does.
Fri, 08 Jun 2018 18:32:48 +0530 next-prev: add tests showing --merge not respected in some cases stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 08 Jun 2018 18:32:48 +0530] rev 3812
next-prev: add tests showing --merge not respected in some cases This patch adds tests which show that --merge is not respected when you set commands.update.check to any value. This is a bug I wrote few days ago and will fix it in next changeset. I like this process of writing bugs and fixing them.
Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:59:39 +0530 evolve: store the evolvestate if relocation results in conflicts
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:59:39 +0530] rev 3811
evolve: store the evolvestate if relocation results in conflicts We missed storing the evolvestate on disk when relocation lead to conflicts. We need to store it to grab information to continue or abort or stop the evolve.
Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:45:54 +0530 tests: add more test of resolution of content-divergent changesets
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 22:45:54 +0530] rev 3810
tests: add more test of resolution of content-divergent changesets This patch adds test of resolution of content-divergent changesets when relocation is required and it leads to conflicts. The test shows that we are not doing the right thing. This will be fixed in upcoming patches.
Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:10 +0530 evolvestate: store info about relocation while resolving content-divergence
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:10 +0530] rev 3809
evolvestate: store info about relocation while resolving content-divergence While resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents, we relocate one of the node to parent of another one and this can lead to conflicts sometimes. So we need to store information about that state in evolvestate so that we can use that when user does `hg evolve --continue` or `--stop` or `--abort`. Now that we make sure, we store the new other node in evolvestate, we fix the behavior of handling the relocated commit and merge the right changesets.
Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:13:54 +0530 evolve: factor out logic to merge content divergent csets in separate fn
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:13:54 +0530] rev 3808
evolve: factor out logic to merge content divergent csets in separate fn This will help us in reusing the logic if we need to while doing evolve --continue.
Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:27:03 +0530 evolve: commit the transaction if conflicts occur while merging content-div
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 20:27:03 +0530] rev 3807
evolve: commit the transaction if conflicts occur while merging content-div Yes, let's commit the transaction in case conflicts occur. Yes, this is what unshelve does and this is one of the reasons we don't like unshelve. Previous patches added support for resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents with parent of one being the gca. In such cases, we relocate one of the divergent commit to the parent of another one. All the relocation stuff and merging divergent changeset stuff happens in a single transaction, so if there are conflicts while merging, we abort and the transaction rollsback and our relocated commit is not applied after abort. We don't want to process the relocation because that can lead to conflicts and we will have dirty wdir because of resolving conflicts. So, we commit the transaction when merging results in conflicts to make sure if relocation happened, we commit that. This fixes the absence of relocation commit found in previous patch and uncover a new bug about handling of relocated commit. Upcoming patch will fix it.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 tip