exchange: add test case for A.1 Testcase defined here: http://mercurial.selenic.com/wiki/ObsolescenceMarkersExchange

exchange: add the pullmarker wireproto command to simple4server This will allow simple server side support. (yes, code duplication is bad I already told you I won't do it too much mom)

exchange: extract computation of pulled markers boundary in a function I expect massive experimentation on this specific aspect. so we better isolate it.

exchange: pull markers relevant to the pulled subset only With the command recently introduced we can select to pull only markers relevant to some nodes. We are now pull all markers for all node in the relevant subset. We'll try to pull less (just markers for node where local and remote marker diverge) later, but we need some marker discovery mechanism for that. which are not easy.

exchange: add a new method to pull markers It has both local and wire protocol implementation. This command does not requires escaping of the marker and are expecting to me highly faster than the pushkey method. The other main point is that command is to accept a `heads` and `common` argument to select to pull changeset only relevant to a set a of node. We are not using this capability yet but we'll do it soon

exchange: add the pushmarker wireproto command to simple4server This will allow simple server side support. (yes, code duplication is bad, I won't do it too much mom)

exchange: introduce a wireprotocol command to push markers Pushkey is not adapted to transmit a stream of binary data. We used it as a hack so far. We add a new wire protocol command to speed the things up (and also push all the markers in a single transaction). The proper way to do it is to introduce bundle2 in core, but this will already help in the mean time.