Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:58:57 +0200 obsolete: unify collapsed revisions markers handling
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:58:57 +0200] rev 298
obsolete: unify collapsed revisions markers handling When collapsing A, B and C into D, amend was registering: A -> D B -> D A -> B C -> D A -> C while the rebase wrapper was doing: A -> D B -> D C -> D At this point, I have no argument to favor one or another or even a new one like: A -> B B -> C C -> D so I am aligning the rebase implementation on the older amend one. At least we can now change them all at once.
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:24:19 +0200 rebase: improve invalid revisions filtering
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Thu, 21 Jun 2012 19:24:19 +0200] rev 297
rebase: improve invalid revisions filtering - Filter rebasestate nullmerge and unrebased revision before considering updating obsolete. This simplifies the handling of obsolete and make it ignore unrebased revision rather than extinguishing them. - Apply obsolete markers only if rebasestate is not empty, testing rebasetarget was irrelevant.
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:00:32 +0200 test-evolve: extend output and exhibit an amend bug
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Thu, 21 Jun 2012 18:00:32 +0200] rev 296
test-evolve: extend output and exhibit an amend bug The extended section shows the parent revision stabilizing itself on another revision, without --any. In theory, only descendants of the parent predecessors or of its descendants should be stabilized, and be stabilized in parent subtree. Unfortunately, stabilize implementation correctly picks the changesets to stabilize but not their target. This problem is aggravated by amend registering too many obsolete markers which prevents the stabilize selection heuristic to prune several changesets.
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:33:02 +0200 evolve: remove --change . == --change .^ crazyness
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:33:02 +0200] rev 295
evolve: remove --change . == --change .^ crazyness
Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:23:42 +0200 evolve: use explicit phase constants
Patrick Mezard <patrick@mezard.eu> [Thu, 21 Jun 2012 16:23:42 +0200] rev 294
evolve: use explicit phase constants
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:04:50 +0200 [doc] update readme stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 20 Jun 2012 18:04:50 +0200] rev 293
[doc] update readme
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:19:21 +0200 [doc] have people update on stable after cloning stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:19:21 +0200] rev 292
[doc] have people update on stable after cloning
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:07:20 +0200 merge with fix
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:07:20 +0200] rev 291
merge with fix
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:07:01 +0200 merge with fix stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 20 Jun 2012 16:07:01 +0200] rev 290
merge with fix
Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:59:08 +0200 [qsync] fix: 'newerversion' expect node id, not hexid
David Douard <david.douard@logilab.fr> [Mon, 11 Jun 2012 11:59:08 +0200] rev 289
[qsync] fix: 'newerversion' expect node id, not hexid
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:57:57 +0200 merge back with stable tag
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:57:57 +0200] rev 288
merge back with stable tag
Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:57:35 +0200 Added tag 0.2.0 for changeset d3f20770b86a stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@logilab.fr> [Wed, 20 Jun 2012 15:57:35 +0200] rev 287
Added tag 0.2.0 for changeset d3f20770b86a
(0) -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip