Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:30:37 -0700 builddependencies: don't remove found deps when divergence found (issue5946) stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:30:37 -0700] rev 3901
builddependencies: don't remove found deps when divergence found (issue5946) It seems obviously wrong to not keep any dependencies for a revision that we had already found (for p1) if we run into divergence (from p2). It also happens to fix issue5946 :)
Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:16 -0700 builddependencies: don't add dependency on revision outside input set stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:16 -0700] rev 3900
builddependencies: don't add dependency on revision outside input set This was already handled in the single-successor case, but had been missed in the multiple-successors case. Note that there seems to be a copy of builddependencies() in the topics extension. I don't use topics more than I have to, so I'll let someone else fix that code.
Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:16:25 -0700 builddependencies: consider all divergent successors stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:16:25 -0700] rev 3899
builddependencies: consider all divergent successors We were only considering one. In test-evolve-abort-conentdiv.t:165, the input revs were {5, 8} and dependency dict was {8: set([]), 5: set([10])}, which is a little weird (10 is not in the input set). It still worked because the callers used it (they seemed to only care if there were *any* dependencies). This patch fixes the issue by considering all successors. That means the dependency dict will be {8: set([]), 5: set([8, 10])} after this patch. The next patch will remove the 10 from that set.
Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:00:49 -0700 tests: add test for issue5946 stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:00:49 -0700] rev 3898
tests: add test for issue5946 The test case is a copy of the one for 5833. The only difference is that the merge parents are recorded in the opposite order (and that the test is truncated because it fails).
Fri, 25 May 2018 17:17:56 +0200 obslog: check filtered output with folded changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 17:17:56 +0200] rev 3897
obslog: check filtered output with folded changesets
Fri, 25 May 2018 16:50:04 +0200 obslog: check filtered output with splitted changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 16:50:04 +0200] rev 3896
obslog: check filtered output with splitted changesets
Fri, 25 May 2018 11:52:48 +0200 obslog: check filtered output with pruned changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:52:48 +0200] rev 3895
obslog: check filtered output with pruned changesets
Tue, 22 May 2018 16:48:35 +0200 obslog: check filtered output with amended changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 16:48:35 +0200] rev 3894
obslog: check filtered output with amended changesets
Fri, 25 May 2018 11:48:19 +0200 tests: add a content-divergent obshistory test
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:48:19 +0200] rev 3893
tests: add a content-divergent obshistory test
Tue, 22 May 2018 17:44:05 +0200 tests: extract the obshistory amend then fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:44:05 +0200] rev 3892
tests: extract the obshistory amend then fold test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 17:42:56 +0200 tests: extract the content-divergence test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:42:56 +0200] rev 3891
tests: extract the content-divergence test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 17:41:57 +0200 tests: extract the obshistory fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:41:57 +0200] rev 3890
tests: extract the obshistory fold test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 17:40:56 +0200 tests: extract the obshistory lots of split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:40:56 +0200] rev 3889
tests: extract the obshistory lots of split test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:51 +0200 tests: extract the obshistory split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:51 +0200] rev 3888
tests: extract the obshistory split test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:40 +0200 tests: extract the obshistory prune test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:40 +0200] rev 3887
tests: extract the obshistory prune test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 15:40:29 +0200 tests: extract the obshistory amend test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:40:29 +0200] rev 3886
tests: extract the obshistory amend test case into a separate file
Tue, 22 May 2018 15:35:54 +0200 tests: extract obshistory setup in a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:35:54 +0200] rev 3885
tests: extract obshistory setup in a separate file We are gonna soon explode the obshistory test file into several, extract the setup to reuse it as much as possible.
Tue, 22 May 2018 12:07:24 +0200 obslog: add a new flag to filter out non-local nodes
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 12:07:24 +0200] rev 3884
obslog: add a new flag to filter out non-local nodes
Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:28:44 +0200 compat: drop compatibility hack for mercurial <4.3
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 26 Jul 2018 18:28:44 +0200] rev 3883
compat: drop compatibility hack for mercurial <4.3 We no longer support version prior 4.3.
Sat, 21 Jul 2018 02:42:29 +0530 compat: temporarily move copies fix to compat.py
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 21 Jul 2018 02:42:29 +0530] rev 3882
compat: temporarily move copies fix to compat.py This patch moves a fixed version of copies._fullcopytracing() to compat.py as this was not fixed in core before release and also we need to do this anyway for the older versions of mercurial. This fix is that when base changeset is not ancestor of any of the merging commits, we don't throw an error. The phabricator differential which will fix this in core is https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D3896. This fixes the traceback we get in previous changeset while relocating one of the content-divergent changeset.
Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:30 +0530 evolve: continue conflicted relocation content-divergence
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Jun 2018 18:18:30 +0530] rev 3881
evolve: continue conflicted relocation content-divergence This patch adds logic to continue an conflicted content-divergence resolution which was interrupted while relocating one of the divergent commits. The tests shows the there is some mishandling of copies internally which will be fixed in next patch.
Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:17:16 +0800 topic: use self instead of repo in topicrepo methods stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 18 Jul 2018 18:17:16 +0800] rev 3880
topic: use self instead of repo in topicrepo methods Referring to repo here was somehow preventing it from being garbage-collected (important in hgweb, where currently every request gets a new repo).
Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:16:17 +0530 evolvecmd: introduce fn to be wrapped by extensions resolving content-div
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:16:17 +0530] rev 3879
evolvecmd: introduce fn to be wrapped by extensions resolving content-div The function added will be used by extension by wrapping it and adding logic to merge data introduced by them. For example: topic extension can wrap this function and add logic to merge topic names.
Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:18:33 +0530 evolvecmd: move remaining logic to merge commit desc to existing utility fn
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 21:18:33 +0530] rev 3878
evolvecmd: move remaining logic to merge commit desc to existing utility fn This was a bit awful because we had a utility function and still we did some of merging outside of that fn. So let's move the remaining parts there.
Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:52:33 +0530 amend: allow aborting an `amend --patch` by saving an empty file (issue5925)
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:52:33 +0530] rev 3877
amend: allow aborting an `amend --patch` by saving an empty file (issue5925) This patch fixes issue5925 by allow aborting a `hg amend --patch` call by saving an empty patch file. This is similar to aborting of `hg amend` when commit message is empty. Test changes demonstrate the fix.
Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:50:16 +0530 tests: add a test to demonstrate issue5925
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 08 Jul 2018 22:50:16 +0530] rev 3876
tests: add a test to demonstrate issue5925 The issue will be fixed in next patch.
Mon, 09 Jul 2018 01:18:40 +0200 test: fix possible output change from 4.7
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 09 Jul 2018 01:18:40 +0200] rev 3875
test: fix possible output change from 4.7 Change in debug timing can display these extra messages.
Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:36:24 -0700 state: add the get() method that evolvecmd:1836 expects
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 06 Jul 2018 11:36:24 -0700] rev 3874
state: add the get() method that evolvecmd:1836 expects
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:56:54 +0200 rewing: prevent rewind in case of uncommitted changes
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:56:54 +0200] rev 3873
rewing: prevent rewind in case of uncommitted changes rewind can update, which means merge and troubles. We might relax this limitation in the future.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:46:46 +0200 rewind: default to rewinding the current stack
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:46:46 +0200] rev 3872
rewind: default to rewinding the current stack
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:10:19 +0200 rewing: add the ability to rewind "from" revisions
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:10:19 +0200] rev 3871
rewing: add the ability to rewind "from" revisions
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:29:34 +0200 evolve: exclude "identical" precursors from the precursors set
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:29:34 +0200] rev 3870
evolve: exclude "identical" precursors from the precursors set I'm not sure it is the right thing to do, but it simply thing a lot for now. Otherwise, using 'precursors' to find rewind direction become too complex. This is going to give problematic result in case of prune. Since there are no other precursors to follow.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:07:53 +0200 rewind: move revision selection into its own function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 03:07:53 +0200] rev 3869
rewind: move revision selection into its own function This will help making the logic more advanced.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:32:29 +0200 rewind: automatically rewind entire stack
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:32:29 +0200] rev 3868
rewind: automatically rewind entire stack We now rewind the full stack, avoiding creating orphans. A `--exact` flag is added to force rewinding only the explicitly specified changesets.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:22:28 +0200 rewind: add a test about rewinding top of stack
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:22:28 +0200] rev 3867
rewind: add a test about rewinding top of stack For now this rewind is creating an orphan. We add the test to check the behavior in that case.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:03:03 +0200 rewind: use rewinded parent when creating multiple changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 02:03:03 +0200] rev 3866
rewind: use rewinded parent when creating multiple changesets Use use the rewinded parent instead of creating orphans based on identical, but obsolete, changesets.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:22:31 +0200 rewind: add a test for rewinding a fold
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:22:31 +0200] rev 3865
rewind: add a test for rewinding a fold The code already have basic support for case. However the result create orphan that will need to be improved. However, we keep this changeset simple.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:36:30 +0200 rewind: add a test for rewinding a split
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:36:30 +0200] rev 3864
rewind: add a test for rewinding a split There are no code change needed but it is worth testing on its own.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:33:43 +0200 rewind: update the working copy if it gets obsoleted
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:33:43 +0200] rev 3863
rewind: update the working copy if it gets obsoleted If the working copy parent is rewinded, follow the rewind.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:04:20 +0200 rewind: add a message about obsolete changeset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:04:20 +0200] rev 3862
rewind: add a message about obsolete changeset Not the best output, but useful to have the data. We can improve that later.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:15:18 +0200 rewind: obsolete latest successors unless instructed otherwise
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:15:18 +0200] rev 3861
rewind: obsolete latest successors unless instructed otherwise To prevent the creations of divergence, we automatically mark the successors set of the rewinded changeset as obsoleted by the rewind result. A new flag `--as-divergence` is added to disable this behavior.
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:32:22 +0200 rewind: test rewinding an amended changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:32:22 +0200] rev 3860
rewind: test rewinding an amended changesets We are now able to rewind a simple amended changeset. For now, its current successors has not been obsoleted and we created divergence.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:57:09 +0200 rewind: add a message about the rewinded changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:57:09 +0200] rev 3859
rewind: add a message about the rewinded changesets This helps to understand what happened.
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:11:52 +0200 rewind: add a proto version of the command
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:11:52 +0200] rev 3858
rewind: add a proto version of the command This first version focus on rewinding a single revision without care for the consequence.
Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:56 +0200 stablesort: make sure heads are processed in sorted order
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:56 +0200] rev 3857
stablesort: make sure heads are processed in sorted order changeset 72621094505f will fix some ordering issue in the `heads` revset so we stabilise the output in advance.
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:54 +0530 evolve: move the bookmarks also when updating to successor (issue5923)
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:54 +0530] rev 3856
evolve: move the bookmarks also when updating to successor (issue5923) When we are on an obsolete node and does `hg evolve`, it updates to it's sucessor, however it does not move the bookmark to the successor. This patch adds logic to make sure we move the bookmark too. Test change demonstrates the fix.
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:44 +0530 tests: add test to demonstrate issue5923
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:44 +0530] rev 3855
tests: add test to demonstrate issue5923 This will be fixed in upcoming patch.
Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:26:16 +0200 changelog: add an entry about the new `evolve.interrupted` section
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:26:16 +0200] rev 3854
changelog: add an entry about the new `evolve.interrupted` section
Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:50:17 +0530 evolve: make one missed error to align other error messages
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:50:17 +0530] rev 3853
evolve: make one missed error to align other error messages Previous patches missed this error to change it to the new format. Let's align this with all other messages raised by `hg evolve` command.
Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:16:29 +0530 evolve: raise error.InterventionRequired instead of Abort when conflicts
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:16:29 +0530] rev 3852
evolve: raise error.InterventionRequired instead of Abort when conflicts error.InterventionRequired is a better error to raise in such cases. Thanks to marmoute for noticing this.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:58:30 +0200 changelog: add a changelog entry about divergence resolution
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:58:30 +0200] rev 3851
changelog: add a changelog entry about divergence resolution We made a lots of progress there.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:33 +0530 evolve: create resolved cset on successors of current parents
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:33 +0530] rev 3850
evolve: create resolved cset on successors of current parents While resolving content-divergence, sometimes, the parent can be obsolete and have a successor. We should consider the successors of the parents instead of obsolete parents as that will do something like orphan+content-divergence resolution both at the same time which is powerful and results in a single stack while resolving content-divergence of stacks. The test changes demonstrates that we can now successfully evolve a content divergent stack.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:11 +0530 tests: fix a test case to not create conflicts
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:11 +0530] rev 3849
tests: fix a test case to not create conflicts This is the test case where we are testing about divergence resolution of stack of patches. If the stack is as follows: C1 C2 | | B1 B2 | | A1 A2 \/ base And A1-A2, B1-B2 and C1-C2 are content-divergent, and merging A1-A2 results in conflicts. Now if you resolve conflicts and continue resoling B1-B2, the conflicts of A1-A2 will still be there. We need somehow to understand the work we has done and not create conflicts again. To test the evolution functionality for now, we make sure conflicts does not occur.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:06:12 +0530 evolve: introduce a resolutionparent variable and store it in evolvestate
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:06:12 +0530] rev 3848
evolve: introduce a resolutionparent variable and store it in evolvestate This patch introduces a resolutionparent variable which will be the parent of final changeset after resolving content-divergent changesets. Till now, the parent is always the parent of one of the divergent node, but now in upcoming cases, it can be a successor of both the parents of divergent nodes.
Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:08:57 +0530 evolve: introduce a dirstatedance() fn to fix dirstate after parent change
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Jun 2018 18:08:57 +0530] rev 3847
evolve: introduce a dirstatedance() fn to fix dirstate after parent change This patch introduces a dirstatedance() function which will be used after fixing the dirstate when we change parents using repo.dirstate.setparents(). Look at docs added for more details.
Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:15:10 +0530 evolve: create a new commit instead of amending one of the divergents
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Jun 2018 17:15:10 +0530] rev 3846
evolve: create a new commit instead of amending one of the divergents This patch changes the behavior of evolve command while resolving content-divergence to create a new commit instead of amending one of the divergent ones. In past, I have made this change, backed out this change and now today again I am doing this change, so let's dive in some history. Using cmdrewrite.amend() was never a good option as that requires hack to delete the evolvestate and also gives us less control over things. We can't make the commit on top of different parents as that of content-divergent ones. Due to all these, I first made this change to create a new commit instead of amending one. But, after few days, there was flakiness observed in the tests and turned out that we need to do some dirstate dance as repo.dirstate.setparents() does not always fix the dirstate. That flakiness was a blocker for progress at that time and we decided to switch to amend back so that we can have things working with some hacks and we can later fix the implementation part. Now, yesterday while tackling resolving content-divergence of a stack which is as follows: C1 C2 | | B1 B2 | | A1 A2 \/ base where, A1-A2, B1-B2, C1-C2 are content-divergent with each other. Now we can resolve A1-A2 very well because they have the same parent and let's say that resolution leads to A3. Now, we want to resolve B1-B2 and make the new resolution commit on top of A3 so that we can end up something like: C3 | B3 | A3 | base however, amending one of the divergent changesets, it's not possible to create a commit on a different parent like A3 here without some relocation. We should prevent relocation as that may leads to some conflicts and should change the parent before committing. So, looking ahead, we can't move with using amend as still using that we will need some relocation hacks making code ugly and prone to bad behaviors, bugs. Let's change back to creating a new commit so that we can move forward in a good way. About repo.dirstate.setparents() not setting the dirstate, I have researched yesterday night about how we can do that and found out that we can use cmdrewrite._uncommitdirstate() here. Expect upcoming patches to improve the documentation of that function. There are lot of test changes because of change in hash but there is no behavior change. The only behavior change is in test-evolve-abort-contentdiv.t which is nice because creating a new commit helps us in stripping that while aborting. We have a lot of testing of content-divergence and no behavior change gives enough confidence for making this change. I reviewed the patch carefully to make sure there is no behavior change and I suggest reviewer to do the same.
Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:20:54 +0530 evolve: always order the revs to be evolved
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 23:20:54 +0530] rev 3845
evolve: always order the revs to be evolved The current code only order the revs if we are resolving orphans and not in other case. The ordering is important when we pass --all and tackle multiple occurence of the same instability. Let's order the revs for each instability. There are enough test coverage of phase-divergence and content-divergence that I feel confident doing it because none of the test changed. The change in test-evolve-content-divergent.t demonstrates the indeed ordering helped.
Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:13:02 +0530 tests: add test of resolution of content-divergent stacks
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 21:13:02 +0530] rev 3844
tests: add test of resolution of content-divergent stacks This patch adds a test of resolution of content-divergence stacks where a series of changesets get mutated as two different series resulting in whole content-divergent stacks. As the tests shows, we are not processing the changesets in right order which needs to be fixed first.
Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:00:12 +0530 evolve: improve error messages when conflicts occur
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 19:00:12 +0530] rev 3843
evolve: improve error messages when conflicts occur This patch improves the error messages when conflicts occur. First, we drop the line 'evolution failed', that is not the best line we can show and evolution didn't failed, it's just interrupted by the conflicts and when user will run `hg evolve --continue`, things will be fine. I still remember when I first saw 'evolution failed', I got a bit scare as am I in a recoverable position or not. So let's drop this scary line. Second, we replace the error messages to say `resolve conflicts and see help-topic`. The help topic was added recently and documents all the three flags very well. Addition of tests also showed that all the three flags works fine with all the three instability type. So we should advertise them more. Third, we now raise the error with our error message rather than raising MergeFailure and having evolution related text in hint or stderr above. This increase the focus on the error message we want to show. After this patch, I think error messages by evolve in case of conflicts will be same in every case.
Tue, 12 Jun 2018 04:01:19 +0530 evolve: point to `hg help evolve.interrupted` while resolving content-div
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 12 Jun 2018 04:01:19 +0530] rev 3842
evolve: point to `hg help evolve.interrupted` while resolving content-div Recent test additions shows that --abort and --stop works well while resolving content-divergence and we should advertise them. This patch does so by pointing to evolve.interrupted help topic.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -60 +60 +100 +300 +1000 tip