tests: update output for new branch cache messsages from Mercurial This makes tests pass again after Mercurial commit c7d236b55a3e (py3: fix formatting of branchmap log messages with repo.filtername=None, 2019-07-14). CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: c7d236b55a3e

metaedit: allow operations on merge commits with some conditions As with fold (see the previous patch), it's allowed to metaedit a merge commit or a set of commits including merge commits (with --fold) as long as there are less than 2 parents of the set not included in the said set.

fold: allow operations on merge commits with some conditions It's possible to fold revision chains that include a single merge commit: just fold everything into the merge commit while saving its other parent (so it continues being a merge commit). It's also possible to fold revisions that include multiple merge commits, on the condition that they merge with not more than 2 external changesets (i.e. a changesets that aren't going to be folded).

rewind: make sure merge commits include files from p1 and p2 Otherwise rewinding a merge commit makes it lose all changes. This fix populates `updates` argument of rewriteutil.rewrite() with parent changesets. That argument is normally used for folding multiple changesets, but in this case it's simply used to include files from p1 and p2. Usually, rewrite() works fine using ctx.files(), but that function can return an empty list when ctx is a merge commit.

touch: make sure merge commits include files from p1 and p2 Otherwise touching a merge commit makes it lose all changes. This fix populates `updates` argument of rewriteutil.rewrite() with parent changesets. That argument is normally used for folding multiple changesets, but in this case it's simply used to include files from p1 and p2. Usually, rewrite() works fine using ctx.files(), but that function can return an empty list when ctx is a merge commit.

py3: make `import hgext3rd.evolve` work

py3: use bytes for template keyword registrations This makes `import hgext3rd.topic` work.

py3: convert _origdoc to sysstr to match __doc__ It's currently stored as bytes by core, so we need to convert it to match Python's expected type for __doc__. This patch can be dropped if D6623 gets accepted.

py3: use bytes for revset predicate registrations

py3: use bytes for wireprotocol command registration

py3: use byte strings for @command registrations

py3: switch from iteritems() to items()

py3: make metadata values be byte strings as Mercurial expects

tests: update output for shorted prompts from Mercurial This makes tests pass again after Mercurial commits f802a75da585 (patch: use a short, fixed-size message for last line of prompt (issue6158), 2019-06-20). CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: f802a75da585

tests: update output for shorted prompts from Mercurial This makes tests pass again after Mercurial commits 4764e8436b2a (filemerge: make last line of prompts <40 english chars (issue6158), 2019-06-20) CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: 4764e8436b2a

rewriteutil: allow rewriting merge commits (issue4561) This patch simply allows rewriteutil.rewrite() to work with commits with multiple parents (i.e. merges). That function is used in such commands as fold, metaedit, touch, rewind. The issue 4561 is marked as easy, the limitation is called unnecessary, no tests fail after this change. What can go wrong.

tests: show what happens when trying to hg touch a merge commit

evolve: further clarify that update is performed only when requested Text further modified by Pierre-Yves David and Anton Shestakov.

touch: let's not use util.acceptintervention() as it's not required

branching: merge with stable

evolve: use right value for branch name when finding branch heads subbranch already formatted as "branchname:topicname", again appending it with ":topicname" doesn't not make sense. It's a little bit surprising that no tests fails though.

evolve: fix confusion in branch heads checking logic when topic in play To provide some context, when topics are in play the branchmap cache we store contains the branch info of a rev as "branch:topic" format IIUC. Assuming that is right, now in present code we don't actually cover this part that "when looking for branch heads where we also have active topic we should look for branch='branch_name:topic' instead". And we get wrong branch heads as a result. This patch make sure that we pass right candidate to find branch heads using branchmap.branchheads() by overriding the localrepo.branchheads() Changes in test file reflect the fixed behavior.

topic: add tests to demonstrate topic confuses the branchhead checking logic While topics are in play, we store the branchheads (which has a topic) in "branchname:topicname" format. After digging into it I found that even in the case when we should have branch heads for "bname:tname" we get heads for "bname". The tests output reflect the confusion in branch head checking logic. Next patch will be fixing the problem.

evolve: fix the inconsistent behaviour of prune (issue6137) Let's not update to any revision when working directory parent is not related to the revision being pruned. Changes in test file demonstrate the fixed behaviour.

prune: add tests to demonstrate issue6137 Here we can see that prune updates off to the parent revision even when the pruned revision wasn't related with the working directory parent. A follow-up patch will fix this.

compat: fix `setupevolveunfinished` for upstream

prune: update to the successor of wdir also with --pair/--biject (issue6142) When prune is used with --pair flag, we can also update to the successor of working directory parent. No need to check len(sucs) or len(precs) here because there's a check for that earlier in the code (it's a requirement of biject). The tests are now demonstrate the correct behavior: when rev 14 was pruned with 12 as its successor, the bookmark that was on 14 was moved to 12. That bookmark was also activated (even before this patch).

tests: demonstrate prune --pair not moving bookmark correctly After `mkcommit n2` line the bookmark is on the correct changeset, but when we prune --pair the two newly created changesets (revs 13 and 14), the bookmark gets moved to their ancestor (rev 0). Instead, it should've moved to the last of their successors (rev 12).