Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:52:33 -0700 evolve: stop passing no-op "progresscb" into continueevolve()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:52:33 -0700] rev 4600
evolve: stop passing no-op "progresscb" into continueevolve() The "progresscb" doesn't do anything in the --continue case, so there's no need to pass it into continueevolve(). This lets us remove the --no-all that was added to the test as a workaround.
Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:45:45 -0700 evolve: _solveunstable() update progress only once
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:45:45 -0700] rev 4599
evolve: _solveunstable() update progress only once There's no need to draw it, then possibly write text over it (with --verbose), and then draw it again.
Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:35:34 -0700 evolve: don't update progress just before clearing it
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:35:34 -0700] rev 4598
evolve: don't update progress just before clearing it _cleanup() will clear the progress, so there's little reason to update it just before (except for progress.debug=yes).
Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:31:32 -0700 evolve: clean up progress bar also when using -r
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:31:32 -0700] rev 4597
evolve: clean up progress bar also when using -r It looks like 1fe3da0b4601 (evolve: add --rev option to the evolve command, 2015-05-05) forgot to update the "showprogress" variable.
Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:20:03 -0700 tests: add some basic testing of progress
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:20:03 -0700] rev 4596
tests: add some basic testing of progress
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:03:39 -0700 evolve: increment progress *after* a whole merge commit is done
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:03:39 -0700] rev 4595
evolve: increment progress *after* a whole merge commit is done The "re-stabilize" step was using the progress that was supposed to be for the next revision.
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:02:35 -0700 evolve: use util.acceptintervention() for closing transactions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:02:35 -0700] rev 4594
evolve: use util.acceptintervention() for closing transactions util.acceptintervention() will close the transaction on InterventionRequired.
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:32:32 -0700 evolve: use context manager for transactions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:32:32 -0700] rev 4593
evolve: use context manager for transactions
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:52:16 -0700 evolve: use consistent message and just re-raise InterventionRequired
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:52:16 -0700] rev 4592
evolve: use consistent message and just re-raise InterventionRequired
Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:47:12 -0700 evolve: use standard InterventionRequired instead of MergeFailure
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:47:12 -0700] rev 4591
evolve: use standard InterventionRequired instead of MergeFailure
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 tip