evolve: merge commit messages while resolving content-divergence (issue5877) While resolving content-divergence, there can be divergence in commit messages too which should be resolved. This patch uses the hg's internal merge API's to merge commit messages of divergent changesets with predecessor as the base. In case of conflicts, we fallback to divergent's commit message which should be changed in future. We should pop up the editor with the commit message and the conflict markers and let user fix that. Tests are added for the functionality added.

evolve: move if-else block under the right block the index related if-else should be only executed when all three base, divergent and other have different branch names. I coded this last night and mistakenly mis-indented it. Caught when I was adding more tests.

tests: make sure we don't result in commit messages conflict Upcoming patches will introduce functionality of merging commit messages while resolving content divergence which can lead to conflicts. We don't want to test the conflicts scenario here, so let's make sure there are no conflicts of commit messages in this test.

tests: don't use mkcommit shell function in test-divergent.t Upcoming series will start merging commit descriptions while resolving content-divergence. This tests are here to test the basics of content-divegrence resolution and we should not be testing much of commit description merge here. Replacing mkcommit function with normal hg calls will help us decide on the commit messages ourselves and prevent conflicts while merging commit messages.

evolve: remove duplicated documentation File saving failure…

evolve: show `hg help evolve.interrupted-evolve` in error when conflicts The help list various flags which you can use during interrupted evolve resolution and description about what they do. This will be very helpful for user on how to continue an interrupted evolve.

evolve: add a help topic `Interrupted-Evolve` This help topic contains description on how the various flags work during interrupted evolve. This help topic will be included in error message during interrupted evolve in next patch.

branching: merge with stable

changelog: fix version number error

evolve: return the new node formed only as the replacement sometimes, the the other content divergent changeset is obsoleted in favour of the local divergent changeset in which case we should not store that as a replacement because `hg evolve --abort` will strip that changeset. Let's make sure we return the newnode only if formed. The test results shows that we are still not 100% accurate as we need to strip an obsmarker.

tests: add more test of --abort flag for content-divergence resolution This patch adds test when we resolve multiple content-divergence changesets at once and resolution fo first content-divergence does not form new commits, resolution of second one leads to conflicts. As the output shows, we are wrongly stripping a changeset here, which should be fixed in next patch.

evolve: prompt user for branch selection while resolving content-divergence When resolving content-divergence, there can be case when both the content-divergent changesets are on different named branches. In that case, we are not sure which branch should the resolution commit should be on. This patch adds logic to prompt user to choose the branch which the resolution commit should be on and then creates the new resolution commit on that branch. This also adds a new test file which have tests for the branch selection feature we have added.

evolve: pass the base revision in _completecontentdivergent() We need the base revision to merge commit messages, branches and more stuff. Let's make sure we have that by passing into the function which completes the divergence resolution.

evolve: store the base of content-divergents in evolvestate We need the base changeset for merging commit messages, branches. Let's store it in evolvestate.

evolve: use cmdrewrite.amend() instead of creating a new commit This patch backs out changeset 88601e1cd5d8. We replaced cmdrewrite.amend() with creating new commit because using amend(), a high level function was not good and creating a new commit gave us more control over things. **HOWEVER** to get more control, you need to get arrange all the pieces together perfectly. Creating a new commit, the existing logic has some bugs around dirstate handling, the `repo.dirstate.setparents()` call especially. Sometimes this fixes the dirstate correctly sometimes not. As Pierre-Yves David said, "Having a "clumsy" implementation with the right behavior is usually a good first step. So having an amend based implementation seems like a good first step.", let's take a step back and get back using amend so that we can have a correct basic implementation which is bug free.