Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:58:17 +0200] rev 2610
obsfate: split markers fetch from successor set annotation
This will help to improve support for pruned changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:55:55 +0200] rev 2609
obsfate: mark successorsetallmarkers public
We are about to use it in another module.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:54:27 +0200] rev 2608
obsfate: mark 'preparesuccessorset' as public
It is used in another module so it is not really private.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:51:31 +0200] rev 2607
obsfate: use 'split' as verb when appropriate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:50:11 +0200] rev 2606
obsfate: improve prune support in _successorsetverb
In the prune case, still have markers (at least the prune markers). If we want
to be able to return these markers we need the underlying function to support
it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:37:03 +0200] rev 2605
obsfate: rename 'successorsset' to 'sset' in the loop
The old name make it too close to 'successorssets', and the shorter name is not
ambiguous in the context anyway.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:42:28 +0200] rev 2604
template: use hex node in the obsmarkers used in the obsfate template
This was pointed by Yuya and yuya is right.