Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:34 -0700] rev 3568
touch: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:26 -0700] rev 3567
split: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:17 -0700] rev 3566
prune: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:51:07 -0700] rev 3565
metaedit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:59 -0700] rev 3564
fold: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:45 -0700] rev 3563
uncommit: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:40:28 -0700] rev 3562
evolve: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 15:50:25 -0700] rev 3561
amend: include "operation" metadata in obsmarkers
This is for the legacy handling support for "hg commit --amend"
case. I picked "amend" because it feels more natural than
"commit". Besides, and more importantly, that's consistent what core
uses.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 10:22:27 -0700] rev 3560
compat: add wrapper for obsolete.createmarkers() that accepts "operation" arg
I want to start passing the operation argument, but hg < 4.3 does not
support it, so we need a compat wrapper. For older hg, the operation
is simply ignored.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 12 Mar 2018 23:26:25 -0700] rev 3559
tests: do not glob out fixed dates
Perhaps these dates historically have not been fixed, but they seem to
be now. I got tired of not being able to use "run-tests.py -i".
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 17:00:01 +0530] rev 3558
evolve: de-duplicate some function calls
_cleanup() was called in continueevolve() and evolve() function too. Let's call
it at a single place for both the cases. Also call progresscb() outside of
conditionals to call it both times.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:11:22 +0530] rev 3557
evolve: move deletion of evolvestate out of continueevolve() function
We need to extract some data at evolve() function from evolvestate.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 16:04:28 +0530] rev 3556
evolve: load evolvestate before passing to continueevolve()
This patch moves some code from continueevolve() to evolve() function so that we
have a loaded evolvestate present in the evolve() function for post processing.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:56:05 +0530] rev 3555
evolve: move the handling for non-continue part in else conditional
This will help us do factor out which operations we want to do for continue,
which for non-continue and which operations we want to do for both of them.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 21:21:10 +0530] rev 3554
evolve: move the logic of continuation handling of `hg evolve` in own fn
The function which defines the evolve command is pretty big with all the logic
messed up there. It's better to have individual functions for individual uses.
The movement of code will help in adding more logic to continue part in clean
way. Moreover for implementing `hg continue`, we need all continuation handling
in their own functions, so it will help there too.