Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:06:43 +0200 obshashrange: clear in-memory cache alongside the sqlite one stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 17 Aug 2018 12:06:43 +0200] rev 3962
obshashrange: clear in-memory cache alongside the sqlite one Clearing on disk data in nice, but we also need to remove in memory one or we'll get incorrect results.
Fri, 17 Aug 2018 01:07:37 +0200 branching: merge with fixes on stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 17 Aug 2018 01:07:37 +0200] rev 3961
branching: merge with fixes on stable
Fri, 17 Aug 2018 01:04:49 +0200 changelog: summarize the recent improvement stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 17 Aug 2018 01:04:49 +0200] rev 3960
changelog: summarize the recent improvement
Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:27:10 +0200 obshashrange: re-enabled more selective pruning of affected range stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:27:10 +0200] rev 3959
obshashrange: re-enabled more selective pruning of affected range
Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:23:20 +0200 obshashrange: fix computation of affected ranges stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 17 Aug 2018 00:23:20 +0200] rev 3958
obshashrange: fix computation of affected ranges The computation of impacted nodes and associated revs is fully reworked. In addition,we introduce multiple new tests covering cases that were previous wrongly handled.
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:45:36 +0200 obshashrange: add more validation output to tests stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 22:45:36 +0200] rev 3957
obshashrange: add more validation output to tests We are about to update the logic and add more tests.
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:12:57 +0200 obshashrange: correctly detect changeset directly affected by prune stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:12:57 +0200] rev 3956
obshashrange: correctly detect changeset directly affected by prune Before this changesets, parent of standard obsmarkers were wrongly considered affected and pruned changeset were wrongly not considered affected.
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:18:18 +0200 obshashrange: do not search for affected ranges above the highest we have stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:18:18 +0200] rev 3955
obshashrange: do not search for affected ranges above the highest we have It is a fast way to know we don't have an affected range for an affected revision.
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:49:55 +0200 obshashrange: do not search for affected stable range cache is unavailable stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:49:55 +0200] rev 3954
obshashrange: do not search for affected stable range cache is unavailable Before this changeset we where resetting in all cases, and then looking for affected ranges. In addition is the stable range were not available, the functions silently returned no ranges affected. Now, do one or the other depending of the availability of the stable range cache. In practice we always do a broad reset because the code detecting affected changeset is currently buggy.
Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:22:19 +0200 stablerange: build closure a bit less inefficiently stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:22:19 +0200] rev 3953
stablerange: build closure a bit less inefficiently The new way make me a bit less sad than the old one.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip