Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:19:24 +0100 evolve: compat patch to fix broken evolve obsdiscovery
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:19:24 +0100] rev 4458
evolve: compat patch to fix broken evolve obsdiscovery This patch preserve the compatibility for the changes upstreamed by e5ece0f46b40 in hg-committed.
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:05:57 -0700 tests: add obslog output to some tests for divergence resolution
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:05:57 -0700] rev 4457
tests: add obslog output to some tests for divergence resolution As suggested by Boris Feld.
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:54:46 -0700 tests: add tests for divergence resolution with split+amend
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:54:46 -0700] rev 4456
tests: add tests for divergence resolution with split+amend As suggested by Boris Feld. G: changed tests/test-evolve-phase-divergence.t
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:53:50 +0100 test: use 'split' instead of 'splitted' in the tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:53:50 +0100] rev 4455
test: use 'split' instead of 'splitted' in the tests
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:10 +0100 evolve: drop the "computing new diff message" for phase-divergence
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:10 +0100] rev 4454
evolve: drop the "computing new diff message" for phase-divergence Future code update will remove this message, dropping it early clarify the future diff.
Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:19:02 -0700 evolve: clarify output when phase-divergence resolution results in no change
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:19:02 -0700] rev 4453
evolve: clarify output when phase-divergence resolution results in no change I found it pretty confusing that it said "committed as abcd1234" when no commit was created.
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:44:05 -0700 tests: reduce dependence on previous tests for setup
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:44:05 -0700] rev 4452
tests: reduce dependence on previous tests for setup The tests in test-evolve-phase-divergence.t built on each other for no good reason, which makes the tests hard to modify and hard to read. This patch cleans up some of them. We should clean up the rest too, but the rest won't matter for my next patch, so I haven't bothered.
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:37:55 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:37:55 +0100] rev 4451
branching: merge with stable
Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:52:30 +0800 topicmap: add compatibility for branchcache that now uses self._entries stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:52:30 +0800] rev 4450
topicmap: add compatibility for branchcache that now uses self._entries
Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:29:22 +0530 evolve: fix over-idented block stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:29:22 +0530] rev 4449
evolve: fix over-idented block
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:48:05 -0700 tests: create "private" repository in already-updated state
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:48:05 -0700] rev 4448
tests: create "private" repository in already-updated state I'm going to add more copies of the repo and it's easier to work with the repo if it's already been updated.
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:23:09 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:23:09 +0100] rev 4447
branching: merge with stable
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0700 touch: use action "touch", not "<function touch at ...>", in precheck stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0700] rev 4446
touch: use action "touch", not "<function touch at ...>", in precheck I just got this message: abort: cannot <function touch at 0x7fde174b69b0> public changesets: f177c51ae98f It has been this way since 1b7b9acda2a9 (touch: use precheck to validate revision, 2017-07-23).
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:44:44 -0700 prune: use action "prune", not "touch", in precheck stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:44:44 -0700] rev 4445
prune: use action "prune", not "touch", in precheck We have been using "touch" since 06ee4ec88190 (prune: use precheck to validate revision, 2017-07-23). That commit modified the tests, so it kind seemed intentional, but I suspect it was still just an oversight.
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:12 +0530 evolve: test a common case of public divergence
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:12 +0530] rev 4444
evolve: test a common case of public divergence evolve: in pubdiv, handle the case when public branch is behind the mutable In public divergence, when public branch is behind the mutable one the behaviour that this patch added is that we relocate the draft one to public side. This should be fine in most case, but might be an issue in some other (eg, when the draft side of the divergence is rebase away from ancestors it relies on.) Test written by Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 tip