Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:55:46 +0530] rev 4703
topic: add tests to demonstrate topic confuses the branchhead checking logic
While topics are in play, we store the branchheads (which has a topic)
in "branchname:topicname" format. After digging into it I found that
even in the case when we should have branch heads for "bname:tname"
we get heads for "bname".
The tests output reflect the confusion in branch head checking logic.
Next patch will be fixing the problem.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 01 Jul 2019 19:15:57 +0530] rev 4702
evolve: fix the inconsistent behaviour of prune (issue6137)
Let's not update to any revision when working directory parent
is not related to the revision being pruned.
Changes in test file demonstrate the fixed behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 02 Jul 2019 21:00:46 +0530] rev 4701
prune: add tests to demonstrate issue6137
Here we can see that prune updates off to the parent revision
even when the pruned revision wasn't related with the working
directory parent.
A follow-up patch will fix this.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:50:57 +0530] rev 4700
compat: fix `setupevolveunfinished` for upstream
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 29 Jun 2019 18:21:57 +0800] rev 4699
prune: update to the successor of wdir also with --pair/--biject (issue6142)
When prune is used with --pair flag, we can also update to the successor of
working directory parent.
No need to check len(sucs) or len(precs) here because there's a check for that
earlier in the code (it's a requirement of biject).
The tests are now demonstrate the correct behavior: when rev 14 was pruned with
12 as its successor, the bookmark that was on 14 was moved to 12. That bookmark
was also activated (even before this patch).
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 22 Jun 2019 18:37:21 +0800] rev 4698
tests: demonstrate prune --pair not moving bookmark correctly
After `mkcommit n2` line the bookmark is on the correct changeset, but when we
prune --pair the two newly created changesets (revs 13 and 14), the bookmark
gets moved to their ancestor (rev 0). Instead, it should've moved to the last
of their successors (rev 12).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 02 Jul 2019 10:17:42 +0200] rev 4697
oops: backed out changeset 7ac40b4ea24c
Anton requested some changes on it.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:50:57 +0530] rev 4696
compat: fix `setupevolveunfinished` for upstream
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 16 Jun 2019 23:39:55 +0530] rev 4695
evolve: fix the code flow pattern of solving obswdir par and troubled revs
Now we will go to _handlenotrouble() (which prints messages about
no revs to solve) only when there is no troubled revs and working
dir parent is not obsolete.
This change also saves us from an issue which was about looking into the
revset (smartset contains troubled revs to solve) when a rev from the revset
gets hidden. This happens in the case when our wdir parent is obsolete. After
resolving obswdir parent we were looking into the revset to check if there is
any troubled revs to solve but we should have performed this check before
performing the obswdir resolution.
Changes in test file reflect this fixed behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 09 Jun 2019 12:07:08 +0530] rev 4694
evolve: refactor for consistent behavior of evolve when wdp is obsolete
This patch make sure that when working directory parent is obsolete
`hg evolve` and `hg evolve --all` don't behave differently.