kevpeng@google.com [Thu, 04 Jul 2019 17:32:58 +0200] rev 4708
evolve: further clarify that update is performed only when requested
Text further modified by Pierre-Yves David and Anton Shestakov.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 14 Jun 2019 22:46:58 +0530] rev 4707
touch: let's not use util.acceptintervention() as it's not required
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Jul 2019 16:55:57 +0200] rev 4706
branching: merge with stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 26 Jun 2019 21:11:25 +0530] rev 4705
evolve: use right value for branch name when finding branch heads
subbranch already formatted as "branchname:topicname", again appending it
with ":topicname" doesn't not make sense.
It's a little bit surprising that no tests fails though.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 25 Jun 2019 21:54:22 +0530] rev 4704
evolve: fix confusion in branch heads checking logic when topic in play
To provide some context, when topics are in play the branchmap cache
we store contains the branch info of a rev as "branch:topic" format IIUC.
Assuming that is right, now in present code we don't actually cover
this part that "when looking for branch heads where we also have active
topic we should look for branch='branch_name:topic' instead".
And we get wrong branch heads as a result.
This patch make sure that we pass right candidate to find branch heads
using branchmap.branchheads() by overriding the localrepo.branchheads()
Changes in test file reflect the fixed behavior.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 14 Apr 2019 12:55:46 +0530] rev 4703
topic: add tests to demonstrate topic confuses the branchhead checking logic
While topics are in play, we store the branchheads (which has a topic)
in "branchname:topicname" format. After digging into it I found that
even in the case when we should have branch heads for "bname:tname"
we get heads for "bname".
The tests output reflect the confusion in branch head checking logic.
Next patch will be fixing the problem.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 01 Jul 2019 19:15:57 +0530] rev 4702
evolve: fix the inconsistent behaviour of prune (issue6137)
Let's not update to any revision when working directory parent
is not related to the revision being pruned.
Changes in test file demonstrate the fixed behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 02 Jul 2019 21:00:46 +0530] rev 4701
prune: add tests to demonstrate issue6137
Here we can see that prune updates off to the parent revision
even when the pruned revision wasn't related with the working
directory parent.
A follow-up patch will fix this.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:50:57 +0530] rev 4700
compat: fix `setupevolveunfinished` for upstream
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 29 Jun 2019 18:21:57 +0800] rev 4699
prune: update to the successor of wdir also with --pair/--biject (issue6142)
When prune is used with --pair flag, we can also update to the successor of
working directory parent.
No need to check len(sucs) or len(precs) here because there's a check for that
earlier in the code (it's a requirement of biject).
The tests are now demonstrate the correct behavior: when rev 14 was pruned with
12 as its successor, the bookmark that was on 14 was moved to 12. That bookmark
was also activated (even before this patch).
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 22 Jun 2019 18:37:21 +0800] rev 4698
tests: demonstrate prune --pair not moving bookmark correctly
After `mkcommit n2` line the bookmark is on the correct changeset, but when we
prune --pair the two newly created changesets (revs 13 and 14), the bookmark
gets moved to their ancestor (rev 0). Instead, it should've moved to the last
of their successors (rev 12).
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 02 Jul 2019 10:17:42 +0200] rev 4697
oops: backed out changeset 7ac40b4ea24c
Anton requested some changes on it.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 30 Jun 2019 23:50:57 +0530] rev 4696
compat: fix `setupevolveunfinished` for upstream
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 16 Jun 2019 23:39:55 +0530] rev 4695
evolve: fix the code flow pattern of solving obswdir par and troubled revs
Now we will go to _handlenotrouble() (which prints messages about
no revs to solve) only when there is no troubled revs and working
dir parent is not obsolete.
This change also saves us from an issue which was about looking into the
revset (smartset contains troubled revs to solve) when a rev from the revset
gets hidden. This happens in the case when our wdir parent is obsolete. After
resolving obswdir parent we were looking into the revset to check if there is
any troubled revs to solve but we should have performed this check before
performing the obswdir resolution.
Changes in test file reflect this fixed behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 09 Jun 2019 12:07:08 +0530] rev 4694
evolve: refactor for consistent behavior of evolve when wdp is obsolete
This patch make sure that when working directory parent is obsolete
`hg evolve` and `hg evolve --all` don't behave differently.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 15 Jun 2019 17:17:19 +0530] rev 4693
evolve: backout 3027005c42c3 to reintroduce a bug for right fix
This patch backout 3027005c42c3 as it was accepted by mistake
while it was being "in-discussion" state.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:17:03 +0800] rev 4692
pick: register pickstate as an unfinished state
This way pickstate file will indicate that unfinished pick command needs to be
dealt with (--continue or --abort) before modifying the repo. Otherwise it
would be e.g. possible to commit during an interrupted pick and that's not
expected.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:14:57 +0800] rev 4691
pick: rename variable for unfinishedstates
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 14 Jun 2019 18:26:24 +0800] rev 4690
pick: actually delete pickstate if --abort is given
Makes pick to be, uh, actually aborted.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 18 Jun 2019 17:17:31 +0800] rev 4689
evolve: orphans that evolve into nothing don't need successors (issue5967)
When continuing to solve an orphan that created no changes (i.e. clean wdir),
_completeorphan() used to create an obsmarker that said that the result of that
orphan evolution is the currently checked out changeset. That's not a correct
obsmarker, because all of the orphan's changes were dropped and so it had no
effect on the currently checked out changeset.
This is an issue that has only existed when --continu'ing evolve, that's why
the fix touches _completeorphan(), but not _solveunstable(). This fix is
adapted from a similar "if node is None" block in _finalizerelocate().
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 22 Dec 2018 18:31:32 +0800] rev 4688
tests: demonstrate obsmarker creation after discarding conflicting changes
Continued evolve creates an incorrect obsmarker that says 2 is a successor of
1. It's incorrect because 1 was dropped as it created no changes to commit
(after conflict resolution that discarded its changes).
If evolve does the same thing in one go (e.g. just by using --tool :local and
without subsequent need to continue) the obsmarker is correct.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 07 Jun 2019 18:14:48 +0800] rev 4687
pick: remove transaction on the whole command (issue6037)
At its core, pick is a pretty straightforward and well-behaving command, it
uses functions already in core hg, it checks that wdir is clean and that
changeset to pick is not public, it checks if there happen to be merge
conflicts and can be --continue'd later, etc.
It is very similar to graft in core (it also uses mergemod.graft function), but
it obsoletes the original changeset. However, graft does not experience this
incorrect behavior from issue 6037.
What happens in the test case for this issue when we pick a revision that
touches both "a" and "b": mergemod.graft() takes the original changeset and
tries to apply it to the wdir, which results in "b" being marked as newly added
and ready to be committed, "a" updated with the new content and being marked as
modified, but "a" also has conflicts. Pick correctly notices this and saves its
state before asking for user intervention. So far so good. However, when the
command raises InterventionRequired to print a user-facing message and exit
while being wrapped in repo.transaction() context manager, the latter partially
undoes what mergemod.graft() did: it unmarks "b" as added. And when user
continues pick, "b" is therefore not tracked and is not included in the
resulting commit.
The transaction is not useful here, because it doesn't touch wdir (it's still
dirty), it doesn't remove pickstate (and other commands will refuse to work
until pick --abort or --continue), it just makes "b" untracked.
The solution is to use repo.transaction() only to wrap code that writes data to
hg store in the final stages of the command after all checks have passed and is
not expected to fail on trivial cases like merge conflicts. For example,
committing the picked changeset. But since pick uses repo.commit() for that,
and because that function already uses a transaction, wrapping it in another
transaction doesn't make sense.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 01:02:36 +0800] rev 4686
tests: demonstrate hg pick forgetting files after conflicts
This test currently passes to show that pick is behaving incorrectly.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 13 Jun 2019 13:27:26 +0800] rev 4685
packaging: follow hg's supported python version (>= 2.7)
"Mercurial 4.3 and newer require Python 2.7." (From
https://www.mercurial-scm.org/wiki/SupportedPythonVersions)
Also add X- prefix, because that's the correct form, apparently.
This line can also be removed in future, since "When Debian supported multiple
Python versions, X-Python-Version was used, but it is obsolete now as no
supported Debian release supports anything other than python2.7." (From
https://wiki.debian.org/Python/LibraryStyleGuide)
That page also mentions "X-Python3-Version".