Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:43:21 +0200 open the mercurial-3.9 compat branch mercurial-3.9
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 28 Oct 2016 15:43:21 +0200] rev 1744
open the mercurial-3.9 compat branch
Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:29:27 +0200 merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sun, 16 Oct 2016 20:29:27 +0200] rev 1743
merge with stable
Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:52:53 -0700 evolve: lock the working copy early in next and prev (issue5244) stable
Simon Farnsworth <simonfar@fb.com> [Sun, 16 Oct 2016 09:52:53 -0700] rev 1742
evolve: lock the working copy early in next and prev (issue5244) Both next and prev depend on a consistent working copy, but were waiting to take the lock until they were ready to alter the working copy. Take the lock before reading the working copy state, and do not release it until we're definitely not going to change the working copy.
Sat, 08 Oct 2016 08:14:21 -0700 evolve: indent cmdnext and cmdprev ready for locking change (issue5244) stable
Simon Farnsworth <simonfar@fb.com> [Sat, 08 Oct 2016 08:14:21 -0700] rev 1741
evolve: indent cmdnext and cmdprev ready for locking change (issue5244) The locking change I'm about to introduce forces an indentation shift. Do the indentation change with no code change now, to make the next change easier to review
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip