Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:37:34 +0700 rewind: make __rewind-hash__ extra field be bytes stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:37:34 +0700] rev 5214
rewind: make __rewind-hash__ extra field be bytes
Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:37:03 +0700 touch: make __touch-noise__ extra field be bytes stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Fri, 27 Mar 2020 17:37:03 +0700] rev 5213
touch: make __touch-noise__ extra field be bytes
Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:30:22 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 27 Mar 2020 04:30:22 +0100] rev 5212
branching: merge with stable
Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:44:08 -0400 evolve: fix some documentation grammar/typos
Eric Spishak-Thomas <emspishak@gmail.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:44:08 -0400] rev 5211
evolve: fix some documentation grammar/typos
Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:44:08 -0400 evolve: fix some documentation grammar/typos stable
Eric Spishak-Thomas <emspishak@gmail.com> [Wed, 25 Mar 2020 17:44:08 -0400] rev 5210
evolve: fix some documentation grammar/typos
Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:48:32 +0100 changelog: mention the recent evolve improvements stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 25 Mar 2020 21:48:32 +0100] rev 5209
changelog: mention the recent evolve improvements
Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:46:37 +0100 tests: merge two tests about split changesets stable
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Sat, 21 Mar 2020 00:46:37 +0100] rev 5208
tests: merge two tests about split changesets Because the removed test case is essentially already included in the succeeding one, the tests are merged by removing the first.
Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:05:53 +0100 evolve: support successors of ancestor of orphan with multiple roots stable
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:05:53 +0100] rev 5207
evolve: support successors of ancestor of orphan with multiple roots The previous code checked that the set of successors has a single root. However, there’s no reason to require that in general. Example: o 6 | o 5 |\ | o 4 | | o | 3 |/ | * 2 | | | x 1 |/ o 0 1 is obsoleted by 3, 4 and 6. We are considering the case when 2 gets evolved. The roots are [3, 4] and the heads are [6]. Before the change, the user was asked which destination to choose, but there was only one choice (6). After the change, 6 is chosen as the destination.
Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:04:06 +0100 evolve: support ancestor of orphan split with unrelated changeset in between stable
Manuel Jacob <me@manueljacob.de> [Wed, 11 Mar 2020 16:04:06 +0100] rev 5206
evolve: support ancestor of orphan split with unrelated changeset in between This is done by searching for roots and heads within the range delimited on both sides by the target revs instead of just within the target revs. Example: o 5 | o 4 | o 3 | | * 2 | | | x 1 |/ o 0 1 is obsoleted by 3 and 5. We are considering the case when 2 gets evolved. Before the change, both roots and heads were [3, 5]. The user was offered a choice between 3 and 5 as the destination. After the change, roots are [3] and heads are [5]. 5 is chosen as the destination.
Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:50:39 +0100 exchange: deal with empty obscommon stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 11 Mar 2020 18:50:39 +0100] rev 5205
exchange: deal with empty obscommon The case can happen, we better support it.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 tip