Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:29:08 +0200 tests: use a more portable form for new lines
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 16:29:08 +0200] rev 2683
tests: use a more portable form for new lines
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:21:09 +0530 topic: don't abort if there is no current topic in stack() revset
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:21:09 +0530] rev 2682
topic: don't abort if there is no current topic in stack() revset Named branches support has been added and we should not abort if there is no active topic.
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 01:58:26 +0530 topics: return a parse error if stack() revset is passed with argument
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 01:58:26 +0530] rev 2681
topics: return a parse error if stack() revset is passed with argument
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:11:07 +0530 tests: add test to show topics working with shelve
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 00:11:07 +0530] rev 2680
tests: add test to show topics working with shelve
Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:31:55 +0530 topics: update current topic to the topic of newly rebased commit (issue5551)
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 29 Jun 2017 02:31:55 +0530] rev 2679
topics: update current topic to the topic of newly rebased commit (issue5551) The rebase code passes branchmerge equals to True while updating to the rebased commit. We need to make sure topic is preserved even after rebase and hence we need to update the topic even when branchmerge argument is set to True. But there is a twist in the tale, merge also uses this part of code and we allow to update topic when brancmerge is True, in merge cases the topic after merge will the topic of the destination commit, not the topic of working directory parent. So we need the function to have information about whether a rebase is going on, and we do it by wrapping the rebase command and storing some value in the config. This is a bit hacky but works for now. This patch fixes issue related to loosing of topic while rebase. Thanks to Boris Feld for the rigourous tests.
Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:28:58 +0530 docs: some fixes to the help text
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 27 Jun 2017 23:28:58 +0530] rev 2678
docs: some fixes to the help text
Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:48:33 +0530 topics: pass 'topics' to ui.formatter instead of 'bookmarks'
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 26 Jun 2017 21:48:33 +0530] rev 2677
topics: pass 'topics' to ui.formatter instead of 'bookmarks'
Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:28:56 +0200 topic: also insert the extra head check with using the new head checking
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:28:56 +0200] rev 2676
topic: also insert the extra head check with using the new head checking This will get the protection in place in all cases.
Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:38:04 +0200 topic: some document for an obscure function
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Jun 2017 17:38:04 +0200] rev 2675
topic: some document for an obscure function
Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:18:59 +0200 topic: adjust head checking wrapping to not interfere with concurrent push
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 28 Jun 2017 18:18:59 +0200] rev 2674
topic: adjust head checking wrapping to not interfere with concurrent push In the previous form, the new topic head was detected as affected and the push was rejected. We introduce a of 'test-topic-push.t' using the new race checker as there have been many compatibility issue with this new checkers.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip