Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:32:11 +0530] rev 2649
topics: add some noise to rewrittent changeset to prevent hash cycle
If we have a changeset with topic `x`, we change it's topic to `y`, fine.
When we change it's topic back again to `x`, we get the hash of the the
obsoleted changeset which had the topic `x` initially. The same happens for few
more cases like clearing the topic of a changeset which initially had no topic.
This approach is influenced from cmdutil.amend and other commands (rebase, histedit, etc…)
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:18:47 +0200] rev 2648
topic-change: update the working copy along when changing topic of '.'
This avoids leaving the working copy behind, removing another large parts of
issue5441.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Jun 2017 13:21:08 +0200] rev 2647
topic-change: cleanup the locking and transaction mechanism
The previous code did not garanted we would release all lock (and was a bit more
complicated than needed.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Jun 2017 07:21:50 +0530] rev 2646
topics: use a dict for successors of changesets produced by topic change
This patch adds a dictionary to store the successors of changesets which got
obsoleted when we change it's topic. This is an improvement in the fix for
issue5441.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Jun 2017 11:55:45 +0200] rev 2645
topic: further simplify the clear logic
We just set 'topic' to None and the rest should follow.
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 21 Jun 2017 03:28:25 +0530] rev 2644
topics: drop the clean argument from _changetopics()
After this commit, None will represent that we want to clean the topic.