Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 25 Apr 2019 14:02:11 -0700] rev 4611
evolve: delete dead calculation of number of troubled revisions
The "count" variable is recalculated in the regular (no --continue)
code path and it isn't used anywhere else (it used to be set to 1 in
the --continue code path, but that now has its own progress counting).
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:23:53 -0700] rev 4610
evolve: drop nested locks and transactions
All callers of _solveone() now take the locks and start the
transactions, so there's no need to do that anymore.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:12:00 -0700] rev 4609
next: start transaction before calling _solveone()
All other callers do this, and I'm about to make _solveone() not
create a transaction.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:22:25 -0700] rev 4608
evolve: use single transaction also when continuing
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 09:41:39 -0700] rev 4607
evolve: run in a single transaction
This speeds up `hg evolve --all` of a stack of 24 commits in the hg
repo from 11.5s to 3.7s (3x). As can be seen in the tests, it also
avoid some warnings about transiently unstable commits.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:01:32 -0700] rev 4606
evolve: extract function for solving one revision, including merges
Will make the next patch simpler.
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:20:32 +0800] rev 4605
evolve: mention that --all is the default behavior now
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 25 Apr 2019 17:19:41 +0800] rev 4604
evolve: mention that not all successful operations currently update wdir
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:07:28 -0700] rev 4603
evolve: add progress support for --continue
The progress starts where it left off when the previous command ran
into merge conflicts.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:56:42 -0700] rev 4602
evolve: reduce scope of progress-related variables
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:49:47 -0700] rev 4601
evolve: move progress-clearing out of _cleanup()
The progress is only used with --all or --rev, so there's no need to
clean it in any other case. It's therefore easier to clean it
specifically in that case.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:52:33 -0700] rev 4600
evolve: stop passing no-op "progresscb" into continueevolve()
The "progresscb" doesn't do anything in the --continue case, so
there's no need to pass it into continueevolve().
This lets us remove the --no-all that was added to the test as a
workaround.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:45:45 -0700] rev 4599
evolve: _solveunstable() update progress only once
There's no need to draw it, then possibly write text over it (with
--verbose), and then draw it again.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:35:34 -0700] rev 4598
evolve: don't update progress just before clearing it
_cleanup() will clear the progress, so there's little reason to update
it just before (except for progress.debug=yes).
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 09:31:32 -0700] rev 4597
evolve: clean up progress bar also when using -r
It looks like 1fe3da0b4601 (evolve: add --rev option to the evolve
command, 2015-05-05) forgot to update the "showprogress" variable.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 10:20:03 -0700] rev 4596
tests: add some basic testing of progress
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:03:39 -0700] rev 4595
evolve: increment progress *after* a whole merge commit is done
The "re-stabilize" step was using the progress that was supposed to be
for the next revision.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 11:02:35 -0700] rev 4594
evolve: use util.acceptintervention() for closing transactions
util.acceptintervention() will close the transaction on
InterventionRequired.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:32:32 -0700] rev 4593
evolve: use context manager for transactions
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:52:16 -0700] rev 4592
evolve: use consistent message and just re-raise InterventionRequired
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:47:12 -0700] rev 4591
evolve: use standard InterventionRequired instead of MergeFailure
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 19 Apr 2019 10:41:56 -0700] rev 4590
evolve: don't use exception for local flow control
The LocalMergeFailure class was added in 3f91654713dd (obsolete Move
merge failure handling into stabilize code, 2012-08-20). I think the
"if compat.hasconflict(r)" check was added later. Now that we have
that check, we should use that for flow control instead.
Note that this means that any unexpected exception from
_relocatecommit() will now just raise (and roll back the
transaction). I think that's an improvement.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:02:08 -0700] rev 4589
evolve: reduce indentation with an early return statement
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 23 Apr 2019 11:01:44 -0700] rev 4588
evolve: remove a useless return statement at end of function
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 21 Apr 2019 13:04:40 +0530] rev 4587
test: move a test to an appropriate test file
This patch introduce a new test file test-evolve-orphan-corner-cases.t
for tests which covers corner cases.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 21 Apr 2019 12:07:26 +0530] rev 4586
test: improve the title of a test
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 21 Apr 2019 12:06:31 +0530] rev 4585
test: remove duplicated test
We have the test in test-evolve-orphan-split.t which is covering the same
case this test does. Also this test states that evolve shows some error in
split case, but now this is not the case we update to the top of splitted
csets.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 09 Mar 2019 19:35:45 +0530] rev 4584
evolve: warn user for the metadata being lost in public divergence resolution
This patch print warnings if some "extras" of a divergent changeset that
is possibly important metadata which is being lost during the resolution
of public divergence.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 17 Apr 2019 21:16:17 +0530] rev 4583
evolve: show a status message when merging leads to public cset
I think it would be fine to tell the user that merging the two divergent
csets while resolving public divergence resulted into the public cset
itself.
If you think we don't need to tell the user, then we can include this
in debug-mode for debugging purposes at least.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 24 Apr 2019 20:32:01 +0200] rev 4582
test: use a shorter test name
This is still long but easier to read.