docs: explain --hidden option Also move the discussion of revision numbers up, and splice the explanation of --hidden into it.

docs: tweak wording, punctuation for better readability

docs: flesh out unfinished bits in the intro page

docs: revive the explanation of divergent changesets in the sharing guide

docs (sharing): more scattered wording tweaks

docs: sharing guide: clarify end-game of "Example 2" - push to dev-repo, rather than pulling into it (consistent with how we work the multiple developer scenario later) - explicitly demonstrate that public changesets are immutable

docs: minor tweaks to sharing guide (suggested by timeless)

docs: add code review scenario to sharing guide The idea is to demonstrate a simpler multiple-developer situation that does not involve getting into trouble. The final scenario illustrates Alice and Bob getting into trouble with bumped and divergent changesets by amending each other's history. The required tests and text are all written, but will need to be heavily revised because of the inserted scenario.

docs: add a bit more hierarchy to the sharing guide

docs: update sharing guide based (mostly) on marmoute's review - don't claim certain scenarios are more/less common, just simple/advanced - mention code review as a multiple-developer scenario (not described in detail yet!) - suggest "hg config --edit --local" instead of "cat >> .hg/hgrc" - use -q less often (and show resulting output) - edit some section headers to be consistent with user guide (example numbers; "amend" instead of "amending") (These are just the small changes; big changes are yet to come.)

Added tag 5.1.3 for changeset c52c15100fb2

prepare version 5.1.3

graft: avoid potential deadlock We must acquire 'wlock' before 'lock'.

commit: avoid potential deadlock We must acquire 'wlock' before 'lock'.

update readme

pull: fix bundle2 part generation The new part generator (allowing partial pull) was unproperly installed.

simple4server: cleanup debug output The debug output got duplicated with the original code. And the cleanup forgot about simple4serve. (code duplicated yeah!)

merge with stable

update readme

discovery: stop being stupid about variable name Overwritten variable are overwritten... The test coverage makes a simple pass in the loop :(

merge with stable

inhibit: explicitly test for None It is always better to check for None explicitly.

#iforgottoamendagain

discovery: port the new hashing version to simple4server

discovery: introduce a obshash1 function using fm1 during hashing (issue4587) The 'fm0' serialisation translate float to text. This give different result between python2.6 and python2.7 (because python2.7 got smarter). The 'fm1' is all binary and expected to be stable so we introduce the ability to do the discovery using hash computed with 'fm1' serialisation. We use a new wireprotocol version (Partly because I'm too lazy to check how to add an argument to the existing one) and capabilities). Support in simple4server is will come in the next changeset.

tests: use 'wget' instead of 'curl' for Windows compatibility The whole test suite now runs without skips, and the only two failures are a bookmark cache issue in test-prune.t, and a local output vs remote output reordering when pushing to ssh. The latter anyway is a core problem.

setup: allow including inhibit in the build Adds the INCLUDE_INHIBIT environment variable to allow including the inhibit extension in the build.

inhibit: Add -D option to the bookmark command The -D option for bookmark is similar to the -B option for strip. It deletes the bookmark and prunes the changes underneath it that are not reachable.

inhibit: don't leave any obsolete commit visible after closing transaction We add a callback to wrap the transaction closure to identify commits that are obsolete and visible. We inhibit them to prevent the user to see instability in the UI.

evolve: apply prune update before creating obsolescence markers Prune used to compute the destination commit to update to after creating the obsolescence markers. This is a commit to prevent a bug that would occur with the changes in inhibit for transactions (next commit). Indeed, with that change in inhibit, when creating the obsolescence markers in prune, they would get inhibited right away and we wouldn't update to the first non obsolete parent but stay on the same node as its obsolescence would have been inhibited (bug).