Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:34:03 +0900] rev 2269
make: fix indent of ifeq-endif
ifeq() can't be a recipe.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:48:20 +0200] rev 2268
tests: update test to match upstreamable version
Name have been clarified, documentation has been updated and some test-case have
been updated to match the intended test.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:45:39 +0200] rev 2267
tests: fix directory names in exchange-D4 test
The test is based on another one and the directory name had not been updated.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:43:36 +0200] rev 2266
tests: fix directory names in exchange-D3 test
The test is based on another one and the directory name had not been updated.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:45:18 +0200] rev 2265
merge back with default
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:51:58 +0200] rev 2264
Added tag 6.0.0 for changeset 165ad227993d
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:51:27 +0200] rev 2263
packaging: prepare version 6.0.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:47:31 +0200] rev 2262
merged with future 6.0
No output changed.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:44:10 +0200] rev 2261
test-compat-hg-3.9: merge with future 6.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:39:20 +0200] rev 2260
merge with future 6.0.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0200] rev 2259
merge with default
We are getting close to cutting a 6.0.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:50:50 +0200] rev 2258
readme: mention the fix for issue4354
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:02:39 +0200] rev 2257
checkheads: add a small debug message in case were we give up fast
When node is unknown we assume it will stay. Yet, we might have markers to it
that are going to be pushed. However, we do not have branch (ancestors)
information unless we are very lucky an all of them are pruned. So for now we do
not do anything assuming this will be rare.
We still add a small debug message to help detecting such situation in the
future.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:46:51 +0200] rev 2256
checkheahds: switch algorithm to use pushed markers instead
We now checks if markers involved in the push are relevant to nodes in the
branch we try to replace. The approach is simpler and more robust.
A test showing the limitation of the previous approach is added.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:47:14 +0200] rev 2255
checkheads: add test where the rewrite of the other branch is not direct
This will help testing that our logic is properly transitive.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:45:26 +0200] rev 2254
check-heads: add tests about old heads indirectly pruned