Wed, 08 May 2019 16:00:34 +0800 stack: check if stack is empty more pythonically
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 08 May 2019 16:00:34 +0800] rev 4652
stack: check if stack is empty more pythonically
Wed, 08 May 2019 15:57:54 +0800 stack: implement __bool__ and __nonzero__
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 08 May 2019 15:57:54 +0800] rev 4651
stack: implement __bool__ and __nonzero__
Sun, 05 May 2019 17:39:46 +0800 stack: get stack data directly from stack and remove stackdata()
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 05 May 2019 17:39:46 +0800] rev 4650
stack: get stack data directly from stack and remove stackdata() stackdata function began its life in 137f8b04901e as a proto-stack: it computed stack revs on its own and only had one property to return, "changesetcount". Later it started to prepare and return more properties, but since b933a8068c17 it was computing revs using a getstack function. And then finally in 17749d9d3968 it started to rely on stack class entirely. It was a good function, but now, when all the logic it provided was factored into stack class, I'd say it's finally time for it to be put to rest.
Sun, 05 May 2019 16:14:53 +0800 stack: use stack._revs instead of stack.revs[1:] in external children revset
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 05 May 2019 16:14:53 +0800] rev 4649
stack: use stack._revs instead of stack.revs[1:] in external children revset The revset in question excludes all revs that are part of the stack. Using stack.revs[1:] works (rev #0 is stack base, which is not a part of the stack), but using stack._revs is technically more correct, because this variable is specifically designed to hold only revisions that are part of the stack.
Tue, 04 Jun 2019 10:30:56 +0200 test: update output to match the parent changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 04 Jun 2019 10:30:56 +0200] rev 4648
test: update output to match the parent changesets This amend was forgotten.
Mon, 27 May 2019 03:42:35 +0200 topic: add a simple option to reject publishing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 27 May 2019 03:42:35 +0200] rev 4647
topic: add a simple option to reject publishing The option is pretty basic but it can be used as base to build larger feature. The main target for going in this direction is to be able to distinct between user that are "simple contributors" pushing topic for review and the "maintainers" or "automation" that can publish changesets.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -6 +6 +10 +30 +100 +300 tip