Fri, 15 Sep 2017 23:13:05 +0530 topics: improve the description if topic is not touched
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Sep 2017 23:13:05 +0530] rev 2937
topics: improve the description if topic is not touched Instead of an empty stack in `hg stack` when topic does not contain any changeset, we show `not yet touched`.
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:48:55 +0530 topics: show working directory branch when topic is empty
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Sep 2017 22:48:55 +0530] rev 2936
topics: show working directory branch when topic is empty
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:09:59 +0530 topics: add tests for cases when a topic is empty
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 01 Sep 2017 15:09:59 +0530] rev 2935
topics: add tests for cases when a topic is empty
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:28:59 +0200 readme: mention compatibility with future 4.4
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 15 Sep 2017 16:28:59 +0200] rev 2934
readme: mention compatibility with future 4.4
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:20:42 +0200 topic: update the message used with --age for empty topic
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 15 Sep 2017 17:20:42 +0200] rev 2933
topic: update the message used with --age for empty topic This clarify things when a topic got emptied by publishing.
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:32:32 +0200 sharing: edit pass
Ryan McElroy <rmcelroy@fb.com> [Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:32:32 +0200] rev 2932
sharing: edit pass
Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:32:32 +0200 user-guide: edit pass
Ryan McElroy <rmcelroy@fb.com> [Wed, 30 Aug 2017 17:32:32 +0200] rev 2931
user-guide: edit pass
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:41:57 +0200 topic: stabilise the output of --age when date ties
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 13 Sep 2017 21:41:57 +0200] rev 2930
topic: stabilise the output of --age when date ties We just needed to introduce sort to stabilize the output order.
Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:48:18 +0200 tests: update after removing of redundant amend commit
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 15 Sep 2017 15:48:18 +0200] rev 2929
tests: update after removing of redundant amend commit Following e8a7c1a0565a, temporary amend commits has been removed impacting all revision numbers in tests including amend operations. Update tests case to use description or hashes when possible and update revisions number when not.
Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:13:51 +0200 topic: setup 'topic' value for working ctx
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:13:51 +0200] rev 2928
topic: setup 'topic' value for working ctx The way amend work in core change in e8a7c1a0565a. The intermediate commit disappear and we can no longer rely on it to carry the topic value to amend. To fix this, we ensure the current topic value can be retrieved through the `workingctx.extra()` value. Since there is no way to carry a "missing" key information in a way that survives and "dict.update" call. We also has to introduce hacking behavior about a special empty value for topic.
Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:33:03 +0200 tests: abstract version number for test-topic-stack.t
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Sep 2017 20:33:03 +0200] rev 2927
tests: abstract version number for test-topic-stack.t Using explicite version number always bring trouble, this is why we have unique description that can select changesets.
Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:22:41 +0900 evolve: use registrar.templatekeyword to register template keyword functions
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:22:41 +0900] rev 2926
evolve: use registrar.templatekeyword to register template keyword functions Now, using registrar.templatekeyword of Mercurial directly in evolve extension should be safe enough. because it has been available since Mercurial 3.8, and minimum Mercurial version for evolve extension is 3.8, too. BTW, this also fixes an issue of "hg help templates" output that template keywords "precursors" and "successors" are not displayed as same as others, because they do not have ":KEYWORD:" prefix in their docstring.
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:06:52 +0900 evolve: use registrar.revsetpredicate to register revset predicate functions
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:06:52 +0900] rev 2925
evolve: use registrar.revsetpredicate to register revset predicate functions Now, using registrar.revsetpredicate of Mercurial directly in evolve extension should be safe enough. because it has been available since Mercurial 3.8, and minimum Mercurial version for evolve extension is 3.8, too.
Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:17:13 +0900 topic: use registrar.revsetpredicate to register revset predicate functions
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:17:13 +0900] rev 2924
topic: use registrar.revsetpredicate to register revset predicate functions Now, using registrar.revsetpredicate of Mercurial directly in topic extension should be safe enough. because it has been available since Mercurial 3.8, and minimum Mercurial version for topic extension is 4.0. This patch also removes modsetup() in topic/revset.py, because it is useless. BTW, this patch fixes an issue of "hg help revsets" output that custom revset predicates are not displayed as same as others, because they are not "inline literal" in reST syntax (``NAME``).
Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:24:57 +0900 doc: make paragraphs before example code end with "::" for reST syntax
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Mon, 07 Aug 2017 23:24:57 +0900] rev 2923
doc: make paragraphs before example code end with "::" for reST syntax This prevents lines in an example code from being treated as a part of normal paragraph. For issue example, lines are folded into one paragraph.
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:41:54 +0900 topic: centralize compatibility logic between hg versions into compat module
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:41:54 +0900] rev 2922
topic: centralize compatibility logic between hg versions into compat module This patch can delay loading obsutil and obsolete modules until they are actually used at "hg topics" or so, if demandimport of Mercurial is enabled.
Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:24:33 +0200 readme: mention the improvement to stack in the readme
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 11 Sep 2017 17:24:33 +0200] rev 2921
readme: mention the improvement to stack in the readme
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 19:18:05 +0200 test: issue a clarifying graph print in tests/test-stack-branch.t
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Sep 2017 19:18:05 +0200] rev 2920
test: issue a clarifying graph print in tests/test-stack-branch.t
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 22:32:50 +0530 stack: properly order stack when gaps existing inside it
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 09 Sep 2017 22:32:50 +0530] rev 2919
stack: properly order stack when gaps existing inside it We transitively search for the next "stack" ancestors, of changeset in the stack not based on other revision of the stack. This should help having a consistent display when topic are interleaved.
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 19:43:07 +0200 stack: display both parent with displaying merge
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Sep 2017 19:43:07 +0200] rev 2918
stack: display both parent with displaying merge This will help understanding merge in the stack. More test involving merge are adding in the next changeset.
Sat, 09 Sep 2017 22:32:44 +0530 tests: add tests for showing stack when merge is involved
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 09 Sep 2017 22:32:44 +0530] rev 2917
tests: add tests for showing stack when merge is involved This patch adds tests of showing stack when merges are involved. This will help us in changing the behaviour and realising that in later patches.
Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:41:30 +0200 stack: move data computation on the object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:41:30 +0200] rev 2916
stack: move data computation on the object We gather multiple data about the stack on the object. Let us move this on the object and keep it cached there.
Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:23:03 +0200 stack: replace 'getstack' with direct call to 'stack'
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:23:03 +0200] rev 2915
stack: replace 'getstack' with direct call to 'stack' The dedicated function do not add any value. We can update all the callers.
Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:19:49 +0200 stack: introduce a rich stack object
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Sep 2017 12:19:49 +0200] rev 2914
stack: introduce a rich stack object The logic around stack object become more and more complex. We great and object to gather and abstract it.
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:45:57 +0200 tests: add tests for `hg stack` showing surprising behavior with gaps
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:45:57 +0200] rev 2913
tests: add tests for `hg stack` showing surprising behavior with gaps The test will help us to analyse in next commit if the things are fixed or not.
Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:22:06 +0900 topic: check availability of obsutil.getmarkers() for portability
FUJIWARA Katsunori <foozy@lares.dti.ne.jp> [Sun, 10 Sep 2017 22:22:06 +0900] rev 2912
topic: check availability of obsutil.getmarkers() for portability Before this patch, topic extension causes unintentional failure with Mercurial earlier than 4.3, because obsutil.getmarkers() has been available since Mercurial 4.3 (tests for topic on mercurial-4.* branches fail, too). This breaks "minimumhgversion = '4.0'" declaration of topic extension. This patch fixes this issue in a straightforward way for simplicity on stable branch. I'm planning to centralize such portability logic in topic extension into topic/compat.py or so on default branch for efficiency at runtime, like as evolve/compat.py.
Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:45:53 +0200 tests: add more explicit test about empty topic from publishing
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Sep 2017 16:45:53 +0200] rev 2911
tests: add more explicit test about empty topic from publishing
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:29:04 +0200 convertbookmark: advertise the new command in the readme
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 01 Sep 2017 19:29:04 +0200] rev 2910
convertbookmark: advertise the new command in the readme The command is in a good enough shape now.
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:15:55 +0200 convertbookmark: properly convert stacked bookmarks
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 01 Sep 2017 17:15:55 +0200] rev 2909
convertbookmark: properly convert stacked bookmarks We ignores pure descendant when looking for revision to convert. This adds support for cases were a linear stack contains multiple bookmark (or un-bookmarked descendants exists). In this case, some changeset are left orphan, but we'll consider the issue as minor for now.
Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:46:10 +0200 convertbookmark: perform all actions at the end
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 01 Sep 2017 18:46:10 +0200] rev 2908
convertbookmark: perform all actions at the end This will make the whole operation more deterministic and robust.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -50 -30 +30 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip