Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:41:50 +0530 next: solve the issue of `next` get confused by split
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:41:50 +0530] rev 4252
next: solve the issue of `next` get confused by split This patch solve a problem of next command which get confused by split. Let me describe how it was getting confused: Initial state of repo: A---B---C After splitting B to (B1,B2): @ A---B1---B2 \ ---B---C X * (note: C is orphan; checkedout to B1) Lets make an amend on B1: @ B1' / A---B1---B2 \ X * \ ---B---C X * Now, if run `hg next` (--evolve is True by default now): $ it would give you choice to choose from B2 and C thinking that C could also be a possbile children for B1, instead of stablizing B2 on B1. I fixed this problem by filtering those aspiring children which can be stablized on one of the aspiring children itself. Changes made in test-prev-next.t shows the changed expected behaviour.
Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:10:56 +0530 next: add test which shows that `next` get confused by split
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:10:56 +0530] rev 4251
next: add test which shows that `next` get confused by split
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:08:56 +0530 cleanup: avoid a Yoda condition
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:08:56 +0530] rev 4250
cleanup: avoid a Yoda condition
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip