Wed, 17 May 2017 09:52:06 +0200 merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 09:52:06 +0200] rev 2372
merge with stable
Wed, 17 May 2017 00:23:19 +0200 obshashrange: to not overwrite the list with the set
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 00:23:19 +0200] rev 2371
obshashrange: to not overwrite the list with the set We reusing the list variable lower in the code.
Wed, 17 May 2017 00:22:24 +0200 obshashrange: properly break out of the two loops
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 00:22:24 +0200] rev 2370
obshashrange: properly break out of the two loops Otherwise we would continue to iterate even after we reseted the cache.
Wed, 17 May 2017 00:21:30 +0200 obshashrange: fix reset conditional
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 17 May 2017 00:21:30 +0200] rev 2369
obshashrange: fix reset conditional If the revision is in "revs" we should not reset the cache. The old code was wrong (Thanks goes to new tests for catching this).
Tue, 16 May 2017 11:21:41 +0200 cache: ensure we warm stablerange cache before the obshashrange cache
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 16 May 2017 11:21:41 +0200] rev 2368
cache: ensure we warm stablerange cache before the obshashrange cache I've been seeing traceback that seems to be happening because of issues in this area.
Tue, 16 May 2017 23:37:10 -0700 evolve: fixing obscache invalidation stable
Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp <rdamazio@google.com> [Tue, 16 May 2017 23:37:10 -0700] rev 2367
evolve: fixing obscache invalidation This was missing a call to the parent's destroyed(), such that any transaction after stripping some nodes would result in a crash (by attempting to read nodes which were stripped).
Fri, 12 May 2017 21:21:31 +0200 obshashrange: warm the cache at the end of each transaction
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 12 May 2017 21:21:31 +0200] rev 2366
obshashrange: warm the cache at the end of each transaction This will help having warmed cache for read only client. The warming is still imperfect in case of markers that trigger a reset, but we are in a better place than what we used to be.
Fri, 12 May 2017 21:00:39 +0200 obshashrange: warm cache outside of loops
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 12 May 2017 21:00:39 +0200] rev 2365
obshashrange: warm cache outside of loops The performance impact will be lower
Fri, 12 May 2017 21:20:02 +0200 obshashrange: "update" the cache on each transaction close
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 12 May 2017 21:20:02 +0200] rev 2364
obshashrange: "update" the cache on each transaction close Right now the "update" does not really file the cache, but it will detect invalid situation and clean them.
Fri, 12 May 2017 20:52:19 +0200 obshashrange: properly invalidate the cache on destroyed
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 12 May 2017 20:52:19 +0200] rev 2363
obshashrange: properly invalidate the cache on destroyed Copy paste is the scurge of code source.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip