utility: use ui.interactive() instead of checking config value Before this patch, the rev selection prompt which pops up in case of ambiguity to ask user to select a rev used to check the config value of ui.interactive which can is by default set to None. We should use ui.interactive() instead which is more smart in such cases. Thanks to martinvonz for suggesting this.

CHANGELOG: add couple of entries about things fixed We are preparing for a release!

next-prev: always respect the --merge flag An earlier bug fix series which started respecting commands.update.check introduced a bug in which --merge was not respected sometimes. This patch fixes that behavior by passing updatecheck as 'none' to hg.updatetotally() if --merge is passed which is similar to what `hg update` does.

next-prev: add tests showing --merge not respected in some cases This patch adds tests which show that --merge is not respected when you set commands.update.check to any value. This is a bug I wrote few days ago and will fix it in next changeset. I like this process of writing bugs and fixing them.

evolve: store the evolvestate if relocation results in conflicts We missed storing the evolvestate on disk when relocation lead to conflicts. We need to store it to grab information to continue or abort or stop the evolve.

tests: add more test of resolution of content-divergent changesets This patch adds test of resolution of content-divergent changesets when relocation is required and it leads to conflicts. The test shows that we are not doing the right thing. This will be fixed in upcoming patches.

evolvestate: store info about relocation while resolving content-divergence While resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents, we relocate one of the node to parent of another one and this can lead to conflicts sometimes. So we need to store information about that state in evolvestate so that we can use that when user does `hg evolve --continue` or `--stop` or `--abort`. Now that we make sure, we store the new other node in evolvestate, we fix the behavior of handling the relocated commit and merge the right changesets.

evolve: factor out logic to merge content divergent csets in separate fn This will help us in reusing the logic if we need to while doing evolve --continue.

evolve: commit the transaction if conflicts occur while merging content-div Yes, let's commit the transaction in case conflicts occur. Yes, this is what unshelve does and this is one of the reasons we don't like unshelve. Previous patches added support for resolving content-divergence when they are on different parents with parent of one being the gca. In such cases, we relocate one of the divergent commit to the parent of another one. All the relocation stuff and merging divergent changeset stuff happens in a single transaction, so if there are conflicts while merging, we abort and the transaction rollsback and our relocated commit is not applied after abort. We don't want to process the relocation because that can lead to conflicts and we will have dirty wdir because of resolving conflicts. So, we commit the transaction when merging results in conflicts to make sure if relocation happened, we commit that. This fixes the absence of relocation commit found in previous patch and uncover a new bug about handling of relocated commit. Upcoming patch will fix it.

tests: add tests for resolving content-divergence when different parents This patch adds more tests for cases when we try to resolve content-divergence when they are on different parents. The last test shows the we are somehow missing the relocated commit in interrupted transaction. This will be fixed in next patch.

evolve: implement resolution of content-divergence when on differet parents This patch implements the basic version of resolution of content-divergence changesets when they are on different parents but one of the parent is gca of both the different parents. The functionality first relocates the divergent changeset which was left behind and then resolves the content-divergence like it resolves in normal cases. This is a very basic implementation because it still does not work on interrupted evolution. Test changes in this patch shows the basic functionality working. The output of dry-run is also required to be tweaked in such cased. Upcoming patches will add more tests and will improve the implementation to work during conflicts too.

tests: add tests for resolving content-divergence with parent change This patch adds a new test file test-evolve-content-divergence.t which tests the resolution of content divergence when the divergent changesets does not have the same parents.

CHANGELOG: add an entry about fixing issue5877

evolve: pop up editor if conflicts occur while merging commit messages Last patch added support for merging commit messages while resolving content divergence. In case of conflicts we fallback to one of the divergent commit messages. After this patch, we will pop up an editor where user has to resolve the conflicts in the commit messages and then continue. Tests are added for this. We need to fix handling in test-sharing.t to use HGEDITOR to fix conflicts and pass the new commit message. Future improvement can be that we should respect HGMERGE while merging commit descriptions too.

evolve: merge commit messages while resolving content-divergence (issue5877) While resolving content-divergence, there can be divergence in commit messages too which should be resolved. This patch uses the hg's internal merge API's to merge commit messages of divergent changesets with predecessor as the base. In case of conflicts, we fallback to divergent's commit message which should be changed in future. We should pop up the editor with the commit message and the conflict markers and let user fix that. Tests are added for the functionality added.

evolve: move if-else block under the right block the index related if-else should be only executed when all three base, divergent and other have different branch names. I coded this last night and mistakenly mis-indented it. Caught when I was adding more tests.

tests: make sure we don't result in commit messages conflict Upcoming patches will introduce functionality of merging commit messages while resolving content divergence which can lead to conflicts. We don't want to test the conflicts scenario here, so let's make sure there are no conflicts of commit messages in this test.

tests: don't use mkcommit shell function in test-divergent.t Upcoming series will start merging commit descriptions while resolving content-divergence. This tests are here to test the basics of content-divegrence resolution and we should not be testing much of commit description merge here. Replacing mkcommit function with normal hg calls will help us decide on the commit messages ourselves and prevent conflicts while merging commit messages.

evolve: remove duplicated documentation File saving failure…

evolve: show `hg help evolve.interrupted-evolve` in error when conflicts The help list various flags which you can use during interrupted evolve resolution and description about what they do. This will be very helpful for user on how to continue an interrupted evolve.

evolve: add a help topic `Interrupted-Evolve` This help topic contains description on how the various flags work during interrupted evolve. This help topic will be included in error message during interrupted evolve in next patch.

branching: merge with stable

changelog: fix version number error

evolve: return the new node formed only as the replacement sometimes, the the other content divergent changeset is obsoleted in favour of the local divergent changeset in which case we should not store that as a replacement because `hg evolve --abort` will strip that changeset. Let's make sure we return the newnode only if formed. The test results shows that we are still not 100% accurate as we need to strip an obsmarker.

tests: add more test of --abort flag for content-divergence resolution This patch adds test when we resolve multiple content-divergence changesets at once and resolution fo first content-divergence does not form new commits, resolution of second one leads to conflicts. As the output shows, we are wrongly stripping a changeset here, which should be fixed in next patch.

evolve: prompt user for branch selection while resolving content-divergence When resolving content-divergence, there can be case when both the content-divergent changesets are on different named branches. In that case, we are not sure which branch should the resolution commit should be on. This patch adds logic to prompt user to choose the branch which the resolution commit should be on and then creates the new resolution commit on that branch. This also adds a new test file which have tests for the branch selection feature we have added.

evolve: pass the base revision in _completecontentdivergent() We need the base revision to merge commit messages, branches and more stuff. Let's make sure we have that by passing into the function which completes the divergence resolution.

evolve: store the base of content-divergents in evolvestate We need the base changeset for merging commit messages, branches. Let's store it in evolvestate.

evolve: use cmdrewrite.amend() instead of creating a new commit This patch backs out changeset 88601e1cd5d8. We replaced cmdrewrite.amend() with creating new commit because using amend(), a high level function was not good and creating a new commit gave us more control over things. **HOWEVER** to get more control, you need to get arrange all the pieces together perfectly. Creating a new commit, the existing logic has some bugs around dirstate handling, the `repo.dirstate.setparents()` call especially. Sometimes this fixes the dirstate correctly sometimes not. As Pierre-Yves David said, "Having a "clumsy" implementation with the right behavior is usually a good first step. So having an amend based implementation seems like a good first step.", let's take a step back and get back using amend so that we can have a correct basic implementation which is bug free.

corecompat: update the tests output to show phase update summary eb9835014d20 in core added support to transactions to show a summary on the phase changed during that transaction. Due to this, couple of tests output needs to be updated. This patch does that. While realeasing evolve, this patch should be backed out on branches where hg<=4.6. CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: eb9835014d20