Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 23:46:35 -0500] rev 4330
exthelper: simplify the ability to register filesets
Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:55:22 -0500] rev 4329
exthelper: simplify the ability to register templates
Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series.
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Thu, 27 Dec 2018 21:26:17 -0500] rev 4328
exthelper: simplify the ability to register revsets
I think this is what Yuya and Boris agreed on.[1] This happens *after* the
extsetup phase now (and after the _aftercallback notifications). But this is
trivial, mergeable between exthelper instances, and doesn't need to have the
extension name supplied when registering.
[1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-December/125888.html
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sun, 23 Dec 2018 21:54:56 -0500] rev 4327
exthelper: support the option argument when registering a command
Largefiles uses this 5th argument with push and pull, so this will be tested in
the next commit. I assume the reason for unrolling and reforming the tuple in
each finalxxxsetup() is to validate that something proper was passed in when
registering. But it's better to explode when decorating than during the delayed
actual registration.