exthelper: simplify the ability to register filesets Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series.

exthelper: simplify the ability to register templates Same mechanism as revsets earlier in this series.

exthelper: simplify the ability to register revsets I think this is what Yuya and Boris agreed on.[1] This happens *after* the extsetup phase now (and after the _aftercallback notifications). But this is trivial, mergeable between exthelper instances, and doesn't need to have the extension name supplied when registering. [1] https://www.mercurial-scm.org/pipermail/mercurial-devel/2018-December/125888.html

exthelper: support the option argument when registering a command Largefiles uses this 5th argument with push and pull, so this will be tested in the next commit. I assume the reason for unrolling and reforming the tuple in each finalxxxsetup() is to validate that something proper was passed in when registering. But it's better to explode when decorating than during the delayed actual registration.

exthelper: simplify configitem registration

exthelper: avoid a [] default arg to wrapcommand()

configitems: move the default values to the registrar decorator The exthelper refactoring of configitems stopped registering dynamicdefault for everything, which in turn causes a lot of warnings about mismatched defaults. There are a few stragglers- I didn't fix topic-mode because I wasn't sure what the default should be, and the alias for odiff was explicitly given a default for compatibility.

topic: make revsets like foo#stack[-1] work too We remove base commit when n < 0 because it's confusing to see base (which technically isn't a commit inside the stack) at both 0 and -n.

topic: make revsets like 'foo#stack[0]' work 'stack' relation subscript function is another way to refer to s0, s1, etc. But instead of aborting in many cases it will simply return an empty set.

exthelper: remove '_' in final_xxx() function names to conform to hg style