Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:06:45 -0700 next: add a --evolve option
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:06:45 -0700] rev 1449
next: add a --evolve option When on a topological head, this option will trigger the evolution of a unstable changeset that will result in a children of the current working copy parent. This should ease stacked changesets workflow by allowing to stick to prev and next to move through a stack of diff, evolving part of it on demand when needed. In case of ambiguity, the command will ask the user to choose. We need a better definition of "the stack of changesets I'm working on" to be able to seamlessly handling branching.
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:42:01 -0700 next: print some message when on a head with some aspiring children
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:42:01 -0700] rev 1448
next: print some message when on a head with some aspiring children Being on a head does not necessary means that this is the end of the road. It is likely that some changesets could be evolve as children. We detect this case and provide a hint.
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:23:41 -0700 next: reword error output
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:23:41 -0700] rev 1447
next: reword error output We move to a more compact and direct phrasing. I'm not fully happy about it yet, but this is a step forward. The listing of candidate should maybe be moved behind a --verbose flag (and such verbose flag be suggested in the error). G: changed tests/test-prev-next.t
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:17:57 -0700 next: refactor the command code
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 20:17:57 -0700] rev 1446
next: refactor the command code We make the conditional flatter and the return more straight forward. This will make addition of more complex cases more straightforward in future changesets.
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:16:57 -0700 next: add extensive testing to the 'next' command
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 21:16:57 -0700] rev 1445
next: add extensive testing to the 'next' command We are going to introduce more complexity to it. We add the full extend of the case we want tested to see how they evolve later.
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:43:35 -0700 readme: add an entry about the obsolete wdir parent hint
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 19:43:35 -0700] rev 1444
readme: add an entry about the obsolete wdir parent hint
Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:37:02 -0700 evolve: add a hint when the parent working copy become obsolete
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@fb.com> [Wed, 24 Jun 2015 16:37:02 -0700] rev 1443
evolve: add a hint when the parent working copy become obsolete This should help people find the right commands to recover from this situation.
(0) -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -7 +7 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 tip