Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 19:37:13 +0200] rev 2614
test-compat: fix previous merge
The merge was a bit too heavy handed in dropping some part of the test.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 19:22:38 +0200] rev 2613
merge with default
Integrate new development around obsfate.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:38:04 +0200] rev 2612
obsfate: by default only display the username if differ from the current one
This will will keep the output simple in the simple case.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 18:03:32 +0200] rev 2611
obsfate: display more data about direct prune markers
This does not handle all cases, but this should handle the most common ones.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:58:17 +0200] rev 2610
obsfate: split markers fetch from successor set annotation
This will help to improve support for pruned changesets.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:55:55 +0200] rev 2609
obsfate: mark successorsetallmarkers public
We are about to use it in another module.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 17:54:27 +0200] rev 2608
obsfate: mark 'preparesuccessorset' as public
It is used in another module so it is not really private.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:51:31 +0200] rev 2607
obsfate: use 'split' as verb when appropriate
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 16:50:11 +0200] rev 2606
obsfate: improve prune support in _successorsetverb
In the prune case, still have markers (at least the prune markers). If we want
to be able to return these markers we need the underlying function to support
it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 16 Jun 2017 12:37:03 +0200] rev 2605
obsfate: rename 'successorsset' to 'sset' in the loop
The old name make it too close to 'successorssets', and the shorter name is not
ambiguous in the context anyway.