Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:12:57 +0200] rev 3956
obshashrange: correctly detect changeset directly affected by prune
Before this changesets, parent of standard obsmarkers were wrongly considered
affected and pruned changeset were wrongly not considered affected.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 21:18:18 +0200] rev 3955
obshashrange: do not search for affected ranges above the highest we have
It is a fast way to know we don't have an affected range for an affected
revision.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 16 Aug 2018 20:49:55 +0200] rev 3954
obshashrange: do not search for affected stable range cache is unavailable
Before this changeset we where resetting in all cases, and then looking for
affected ranges. In addition is the stable range were not available, the
functions silently returned no ranges affected.
Now, do one or the other depending of the availability of the stable range
cache. In practice we always do a broad reset because the code detecting
affected changeset is currently buggy.