Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:52:06 +0200] rev 3914
branching: merge default into stable
The stable branch of Mercurial core now contains Mercurial 4.7 so evolve branch
policy requires this merge. The @ bookmark is in the right location, so people
doing clone will get to the latest release.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 12:07:39 +0200] rev 3913
branching: merge with the other head
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:48:15 +0200] rev 3912
test-compat: backed out changeset 8fe8152ff071
These output change were for 4.7 only.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:47:20 +0200] rev 3911
test-compat: backed out changeset 41fc764bf28c
These output change are for mercurial-4.7 only
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:46:30 +0200] rev 3910
test-compat: backed out changeset dda5b2134b32
These change were for Mercurial 4.7 only.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:45:01 +0200] rev 3909
test-compat: backout change to 1e103c7f7663
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 11:25:57 +0200] rev 3908
compat: use older API for older version
This API changed in 4.7, we need to adjust.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:28:19 +0200] rev 3907
branching: create mercurial-4.6 branch for updated test output
This branch will be used to check for 4.6 compatibility.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:12:01 -0700] rev 3906
builddependencies: extract function for getting successors
The code no longer makes a difference between single- and
mult-successor cases and just needs a set (or generator, really) of
successors to iterate over. Let's extract that into a function.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 16:23:25 -0700] rev 3905
builddependencies: share code between single- and multi-successor cases
The two cases now have more similar structure ("if succ in revs:
dependencies[r].add(succ)"), so let's share the code so it doesn't
start drifting apart again.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:33:48 -0700] rev 3904
builddependencies: build inverse dict from forward dict
It's error-prone to keep "dependencies" and "rdependencies" in sync
(we don't do it correctly when there are multiple successors or a
node). It's easier to just create "rependencies" from "dependencies"
after it's complete.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:21:49 -0700] rev 3903
builddependencies: remove a use of defaultdict
I don't see much reason to make "rdependencies" be a defaultdict when
"dependencies" is not. It's easy to initialize each entry ourselves.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 31 Jul 2018 09:03:35 +0200] rev 3902
branching: merge with stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:30:37 -0700] rev 3901
builddependencies: don't remove found deps when divergence found (issue5946)
It seems obviously wrong to not keep any dependencies for a revision
that we had already found (for p1) if we run into divergence (from
p2). It also happens to fix issue5946 :)
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:47:16 -0700] rev 3900
builddependencies: don't add dependency on revision outside input set
This was already handled in the single-successor case, but had been
missed in the multiple-successors case.
Note that there seems to be a copy of builddependencies() in the
topics extension. I don't use topics more than I have to, so I'll let
someone else fix that code.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 15:16:25 -0700] rev 3899
builddependencies: consider all divergent successors
We were only considering one. In test-evolve-abort-conentdiv.t:165,
the input revs were {5, 8} and dependency dict was {8: set([]), 5:
set([10])}, which is a little weird (10 is not in the input set). It
still worked because the callers used it (they seemed to only care if
there were *any* dependencies).
This patch fixes the issue by considering all successors. That means
the dependency dict will be {8: set([]), 5: set([8, 10])} after this
patch. The next patch will remove the 10 from that set.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 25 Jul 2018 14:00:49 -0700] rev 3898
tests: add test for issue5946
The test case is a copy of the one for 5833. The only difference is
that the merge parents are recorded in the opposite order (and that
the test is truncated because it fails).
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 17:17:56 +0200] rev 3897
obslog: check filtered output with folded changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 16:50:04 +0200] rev 3896
obslog: check filtered output with splitted changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:52:48 +0200] rev 3895
obslog: check filtered output with pruned changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 16:48:35 +0200] rev 3894
obslog: check filtered output with amended changesets
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 25 May 2018 11:48:19 +0200] rev 3893
tests: add a content-divergent obshistory test
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:44:05 +0200] rev 3892
tests: extract the obshistory amend then fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:42:56 +0200] rev 3891
tests: extract the content-divergence test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:41:57 +0200] rev 3890
tests: extract the obshistory fold test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:40:56 +0200] rev 3889
tests: extract the obshistory lots of split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:51 +0200] rev 3888
tests: extract the obshistory split test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 17:37:40 +0200] rev 3887
tests: extract the obshistory prune test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:40:29 +0200] rev 3886
tests: extract the obshistory amend test case into a separate file
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 May 2018 15:35:54 +0200] rev 3885
tests: extract obshistory setup in a separate file
We are gonna soon explode the obshistory test file into several, extract the
setup to reuse it as much as possible.