Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:50:15 +0200 stack: improve set combination logic
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:50:15 +0200] rev 4478
stack: improve set combination logic
Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:49:22 +0200 stack: fix phasecache._phasesets check logic
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 06 Apr 2019 15:49:22 +0200] rev 4477
stack: fix phasecache._phasesets check logic When _phasesets is not None, it's a list, and it contains set()s of revisions in a specific phase, starting from public, draft, secret and so on. But since repos are supposed to have the majority of revisions in public phase, the first element of this list is not a (potentially huge) set, but None. Previously this code tried to check if there's any element that is None, and was always finding None at index 0, so the short path was executed every time and the rest of the function was never used.
Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:41:57 +0530 evolve: remove todo markers from a test which has been fixed
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 02 Apr 2019 12:41:57 +0530] rev 4476
evolve: remove todo markers from a test which has been fixed
Fri, 05 Apr 2019 22:28:07 +0200 next: clarify tests related to `commands.update.check` test
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2019 22:28:07 +0200] rev 4475
next: clarify tests related to `commands.update.check` test This clarify the test and help understand the next changeset.
Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:20:34 +0800 stack: simplify phasecache checks in _stackcandidates()
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 03 Apr 2019 17:20:34 +0800] rev 4474
stack: simplify phasecache checks in _stackcandidates()
Fri, 05 Apr 2019 17:45:59 +0200 evolve: fix divergence resolution when not merging a descendant
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2019 17:45:59 +0200] rev 4473
evolve: fix divergence resolution when not merging a descendant In divergence resolution, when we merge other cset with divergent one we pass a `mergeancestor` arg to merge.update() and before this patch we were passing `mergeancestor` as True in every case. But it should be True only when we are merging a descendant onto an ancestor. When mergeancestor is True it does two things: 1) allows the merge if the destination is the same as the parent of the ctx (so we can use graft to copy commits) 2) informs update that the incoming changes are newer than the destination so it doesn't prompt about "remote changed foo which local deleted". So this patch change it to pass `mergeancestor` as True only when it is required. And changes in test file shows that it wasn't prompting either in those cases when it should (acc. to 2nd point) Test written by Pierre-Yves David, based the one updated in 5dbaabfe2c59.
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:15:07 +0100 test: fix a phase divergence test case to actually not contains conflict
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Mar 2019 15:15:07 +0100] rev 4472
test: fix a phase divergence test case to actually not contains conflict The previous test case had a conflict, but that conflict is currently not raise by phase divergence resolution. This is an independent bug to solve.
Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:31:45 +0200 tests: use current instability names everywhere
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 05 Apr 2019 16:31:45 +0200] rev 4471
tests: use current instability names everywhere
Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:24:28 +0200 test: apply unstability resolution to `test-unstability-resolution-result.t`
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:24:28 +0200] rev 4470
test: apply unstability resolution to `test-unstability-resolution-result.t` The test cases in this file probably deserved to be dispatched in other more thematic test file.
Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:06:33 +0200 test: rename and clarify content of test-unstable-content-divergent.t
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Apr 2019 12:06:33 +0200] rev 4469
test: rename and clarify content of test-unstable-content-divergent.t The troubles → instabilities renaming was not applied here.
Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:53:05 +0200 test: rename and clarify content of test-unstable-orphan.t
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 04 Apr 2019 11:53:05 +0200] rev 4468
test: rename and clarify content of test-unstable-orphan.t The troubles → instabilities renaming was not applied here.
Wed, 03 Apr 2019 01:00:33 +0530 evolve: refactor the code which swap two nodes (in divergence resolution)
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 03 Apr 2019 01:00:33 +0530] rev 4467
evolve: refactor the code which swap two nodes (in divergence resolution) I see that we are using the code to swap the "divergent" and "other" node; and updating the evolvestate accordingly at many places in divergence resolution. This patch extract that code to a function. Although I don't have strong opinion on this patch. It's a volunteered patch to remove some redundancy.
Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:01:43 +0530 evolve: remove tmpctx arg from _resolvephasedivergent()
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 02 Apr 2019 18:01:43 +0530] rev 4466
evolve: remove tmpctx arg from _resolvephasedivergent() Before this patch, in _resolvephasedivergent() function we were passing an optional argument "tmpctx" which was used to store a rebased version of bumped if required. But for sake of simplicity we can achieve the same results even without passing this "tmpctx" into that function. No changes in test files demonstrate that this patch don't break anything.
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:48:36 +0100 doc: clarify _resolvephasedivergent role and constraint
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:48:36 +0100] rev 4465
doc: clarify _resolvephasedivergent role and constraint Small documentation patch before larger changes.
Tue, 02 Apr 2019 20:32:15 +0200 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 02 Apr 2019 20:32:15 +0200] rev 4464
branching: merge with stable
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:39:10 +0800 evolve: unindent some lines caught by flake8 stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:39:10 +0800] rev 4463
evolve: unindent some lines caught by flake8 The message was: "E117 over-indented".
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:29 +0800 obsexchange: avoid importing io/StringIO module with a different name stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:29 +0800] rev 4462
obsexchange: avoid importing io/StringIO module with a different name Since we're not interested in the whole module, let's shorten the imports and aviod the lint warnings. Otherwise pep8-naming complains: - import io as StringIO: N812 lowercase imported as non lowercase - import StringIO as io: N813 camelcase imported as lowercase
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:05 +0800 evolve: remove unused StringIO import stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:05 +0800] rev 4461
evolve: remove unused StringIO import
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:45:07 -0700 compat: add support for new arg name in memfilectx.__init__ stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:45:07 -0700] rev 4460
compat: add support for new arg name in memfilectx.__init__ This makes us compatible with 550a172a603b (memctx: rename constructor argument "copied" to "copysource" (API), 2019-03-19).
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000 topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor stable
Martijn Pieters <mj@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000] rev 4459
topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor See https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5290
Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:19:24 +0100 evolve: compat patch to fix broken evolve obsdiscovery
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 29 Mar 2019 11:19:24 +0100] rev 4458
evolve: compat patch to fix broken evolve obsdiscovery This patch preserve the compatibility for the changes upstreamed by e5ece0f46b40 in hg-committed.
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:05:57 -0700 tests: add obslog output to some tests for divergence resolution
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 15:05:57 -0700] rev 4457
tests: add obslog output to some tests for divergence resolution As suggested by Boris Feld.
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:54:46 -0700 tests: add tests for divergence resolution with split+amend
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 14:54:46 -0700] rev 4456
tests: add tests for divergence resolution with split+amend As suggested by Boris Feld. G: changed tests/test-evolve-phase-divergence.t
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:53:50 +0100 test: use 'split' instead of 'splitted' in the tests
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:53:50 +0100] rev 4455
test: use 'split' instead of 'splitted' in the tests
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:10 +0100 evolve: drop the "computing new diff message" for phase-divergence
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 12:30:10 +0100] rev 4454
evolve: drop the "computing new diff message" for phase-divergence Future code update will remove this message, dropping it early clarify the future diff.
Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:19:02 -0700 evolve: clarify output when phase-divergence resolution results in no change
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:19:02 -0700] rev 4453
evolve: clarify output when phase-divergence resolution results in no change I found it pretty confusing that it said "committed as abcd1234" when no commit was created.
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:44:05 -0700 tests: reduce dependence on previous tests for setup
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:44:05 -0700] rev 4452
tests: reduce dependence on previous tests for setup The tests in test-evolve-phase-divergence.t built on each other for no good reason, which makes the tests hard to modify and hard to read. This patch cleans up some of them. We should clean up the rest too, but the rest won't matter for my next patch, so I haven't bothered.
Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:37:55 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:37:55 +0100] rev 4451
branching: merge with stable
Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:52:30 +0800 topicmap: add compatibility for branchcache that now uses self._entries stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:52:30 +0800] rev 4450
topicmap: add compatibility for branchcache that now uses self._entries
Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:29:22 +0530 evolve: fix over-idented block stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:29:22 +0530] rev 4449
evolve: fix over-idented block
Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:48:05 -0700 tests: create "private" repository in already-updated state
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:48:05 -0700] rev 4448
tests: create "private" repository in already-updated state I'm going to add more copies of the repo and it's easier to work with the repo if it's already been updated.
Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:23:09 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:23:09 +0100] rev 4447
branching: merge with stable
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0700 touch: use action "touch", not "<function touch at ...>", in precheck stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0700] rev 4446
touch: use action "touch", not "<function touch at ...>", in precheck I just got this message: abort: cannot <function touch at 0x7fde174b69b0> public changesets: f177c51ae98f It has been this way since 1b7b9acda2a9 (touch: use precheck to validate revision, 2017-07-23).
Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:44:44 -0700 prune: use action "prune", not "touch", in precheck stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:44:44 -0700] rev 4445
prune: use action "prune", not "touch", in precheck We have been using "touch" since 06ee4ec88190 (prune: use precheck to validate revision, 2017-07-23). That commit modified the tests, so it kind seemed intentional, but I suspect it was still just an oversight.
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:12 +0530 evolve: test a common case of public divergence
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:12 +0530] rev 4444
evolve: test a common case of public divergence evolve: in pubdiv, handle the case when public branch is behind the mutable In public divergence, when public branch is behind the mutable one the behaviour that this patch added is that we relocate the draft one to public side. This should be fine in most case, but might be an issue in some other (eg, when the draft side of the divergence is rebase away from ancestors it relies on.) Test written by Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>
Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:29:44 +0530 evolve: add condition in case of pubdiv to not swap the two div csets
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:29:44 +0530] rev 4443
evolve: add condition in case of pubdiv to not swap the two div csets In public divergence, we have pinned the public cset to the local side when merge is performed. And in divergence resolution implementation divergent cset is the one who is kept at the local side, so to say this in one line: we have pinned public cset to the divergent side. However, in some cases we need to swap the "divergent" and "other" but we can't swap them in case of public divergence as thought would cause an error because of not being able to relocate public cset.
Sat, 23 Mar 2019 02:10:31 +0530 evolve: add logic to handle a particular case in divergence resolution
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 23 Mar 2019 02:10:31 +0530] rev 4442
evolve: add logic to handle a particular case in divergence resolution Case is: In content divergence, to check if the two csets are on different parent or same parent what we do is find gca of the two csets and then compare it with the singlesuccessors of two csets's parents. Now, if gca is same as singlesuccessors of both the csets then we conclude that both are on the same parent which is not totally correct as it is possible that both the parents of two csets are obsolete with a single successor. This patch adds the logic to cover the above metioned case correctly, deciding the part when we need to relocate a cset to other side while resolving the stack of divergent csets. Changes in test file demonstrate that before this patch we were not doing it right because it should have relocated every node to other side instead of just relocating the first one from the stack.
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:16:44 +0530 evolve: add a test reflecting wrong behaviour of content-div resolution
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Mar 2019 00:16:44 +0530] rev 4441
evolve: add a test reflecting wrong behaviour of content-div resolution This patch shows that currently the case when stack of divergent csets have different parents is not handled correctly. For a stack of csets which has different parent, right behaviour is to relocate every node before performing merge but present implementation only relocate first cset in the stack and skip relocation for the rest of csets, this is not what we expect it to do. Next patch will be about fixing this issue.
Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:45:07 -0700 compat: add support for new arg name in memfilectx.__init__
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 22 Mar 2019 09:45:07 -0700] rev 4440
compat: add support for new arg name in memfilectx.__init__ This makes us compatible with 550a172a603b (memctx: rename constructor argument "copied" to "copysource" (API), 2019-03-19).
Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:32:14 +0530 evolve: preserve compatibility for hg < 4.8 versions
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 13 Mar 2019 17:32:14 +0530] rev 4439
evolve: preserve compatibility for hg < 4.8 versions This patch make sure evolve don't break if user using a version of hg before this 7694b685bb10 patch on hg-committed.
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 19:25:34 +0530 evolve: warn user if cset desc is being lost
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 09 Mar 2019 19:25:34 +0530] rev 4438
evolve: warn user if cset desc is being lost In public divergence when merging results in same as public cset, we only create markers to solve the divergence i.e. [(public, (other,))] In this case if other cset had a desc which was different from public that will be lost. So this print out a warning message to user that desc of non-public cset is being lost. Changes in test files reflect the added behaviour.
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:00:08 +0100 changelog: mention latest improvement
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:00:08 +0100] rev 4437
changelog: mention latest improvement
Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:50:00 +0800 stack: make @ (current) more important than $ (some sort of unstable)
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 10 Mar 2019 18:50:00 +0800] rev 4436
stack: make @ (current) more important than $ (some sort of unstable) Base is still ^ even if it's currently checked out.
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:53 +0800 stack: show content and phase divergent state and symbol
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 09 Mar 2019 13:13:53 +0800] rev 4435
stack: show content and phase divergent state and symbol Replacing ' ' with '-' is just for color labels.
Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:54:00 +0800 stack: handle external-children just like other states
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 09 Mar 2019 12:54:00 +0800] rev 4434
stack: handle external-children just like other states This also fixes color labels: previously when external-children was combined with another state, --color=debug would show something like: [topic.stack.index topic.stack.index.current - external-children|s4] Now there is a separate label for each state.
Thu, 07 Mar 2019 22:50:56 +0800 stack: optimize revset used for stack --children
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2019 22:50:56 +0800] rev 4433
stack: optimize revset used for stack --children Since that option needs to exclude changesets on the current stack, let's just use stack.revs (that are cached) for that and skip branch() or topic() revset. st.revs[0] is the stack base, we don't consider it actual part of stack.
Thu, 07 Mar 2019 19:13:45 +0800 stack: rename unstable -> orphan
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2019 19:13:45 +0800] rev 4432
stack: rename unstable -> orphan That's the only instability stack can currently show, but it's about to show more and showing "unstable" for one type of instability just isn't good.
Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:47:08 +0800 evolvecmd: compatibility with older geteffectflag() that took a tuple
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:47:08 +0800] rev 4431
evolvecmd: compatibility with older geteffectflag() that took a tuple Before bae6f1418a95 the function took a tuple of 2 arguments instead of these 2 arguments directly.
Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:42:32 +0800 obshistory: remove unused geteffectflag(), it's been in core since 4.4
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2019 21:42:32 +0800] rev 4430
obshistory: remove unused geteffectflag(), it's been in core since 4.4
Wed, 06 Mar 2019 16:56:25 +0800 compat: remove old vocabulary change fallbacks
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 06 Mar 2019 16:56:25 +0800] rev 4429
compat: remove old vocabulary change fallbacks Mercurial 4.4 (minimal hg version evolve currently supports) already uses the new names and in fact has deprecation warnings saying that 4.4 is the last version of Mercurial to support the old names.
Thu, 07 Mar 2019 10:51:48 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 07 Mar 2019 10:51:48 +0100] rev 4428
branching: merge with stable
Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:57:43 +0530 evolve: fix a typo from directory to dirty stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:57:43 +0530] rev 4427
evolve: fix a typo from directory to dirty
Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:47:14 +0530 evolve: fix the dirstate after setting parents with dirty wdir (issue5930) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:47:14 +0530] rev 4426
evolve: fix the dirstate after setting parents with dirty wdir (issue5930) Before this patch, during an interrupted evolve it can be confused about copies. This patch fix the dirstate when parents are changed using dirstate.setparents() with a dirty wdir. Changes in test file reflect the fixed behaviour.
Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:02:05 +0530 evolve: add tests which shows evolve can get confused about copies (issue5930) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 07 Mar 2019 01:02:05 +0530] rev 4425
evolve: add tests which shows evolve can get confused about copies (issue5930) This test demonstrate that an interrupted evolve can get confused about copies. Next patch will fix this.
Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:15:05 +0530 test: include some documentation to describe the case briefly stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Mar 2019 21:15:05 +0530] rev 4424
test: include some documentation to describe the case briefly
Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:07:23 +0530 split: use ui.configoverride to preserve phase while commiting stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 05 Mar 2019 20:07:23 +0530] rev 4423
split: use ui.configoverride to preserve phase while commiting As we need to preserve the phase of revision which is going to be splitted into multiple revision. This patch use ui.configoverrides to temporarily overwrite the phases.new-commit config option at the time of committing a new node.
Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:30:15 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:30:15 +0100] rev 4422
branching: merge with stable
Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:54:49 +0100 changelog: add entries for the recent fixes stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:54:49 +0100] rev 4421
changelog: add entries for the recent fixes
Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:16:51 +0530 evolve: make sure user can recover from conflict (issue6053) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:16:51 +0530] rev 4420
evolve: make sure user can recover from conflict (issue6053) we make sure while continuing interrupted evolve it reach to right code This patch fix the issue6053 which is about falling evolve into unrecoverable state and this is how it call fall into it: If after some rewrite operations we reach to a point where resparent for two content divergent csets is obsolete and we hit a conflict in relocation, so now if you run `hg evolve --continue` after resolving the conflict: code execution would check if wdir parent is obsolete and run solveobswdp() rather than going to continueevolve() part and there we will hit by a "abort: outstanding uncommitted merge" And same for `--abort` or `--stop` flags. Changes in tests reflect the fixed behaviour.
Mon, 04 Mar 2019 02:55:38 +0530 evolve: add test which shows unrecoverable evolve state (issue6053) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 02:55:38 +0530] rev 4419
evolve: add test which shows unrecoverable evolve state (issue6053)
Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:34:29 +0530 evolve: add a test in pubdiv where only merging leads to conflict
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:34:29 +0530] rev 4418
evolve: add a test in pubdiv where only merging leads to conflict Added a test in public divergence where both the cset are on the different parent and no conflict in relocation but in merging.
Thu, 28 Feb 2019 03:12:39 +0530 evolve: cover continue case in pubdiv when merging results in same as public
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 03:12:39 +0530] rev 4417
evolve: cover continue case in pubdiv when merging results in same as public This patch is the part of a series which is adding support of public divergence resolution of the case when merging results in same as pubic cset. Changes made in this patch cover the --continue flag for the case: when we had conflicts in merging. Modified lines in previously added tests reflects the changed behaviour. Also added some additional tests. I guess I have covered every possbile case in test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t While reviewing, if you see any test missed please let me know. (I think there is one test missed that I will send as a follow-up)
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:02:51 +0530 evolve: handle a case in pubic-div when merging results in same as public
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:02:51 +0530] rev 4416
evolve: handle a case in pubic-div when merging results in same as public In public divergence resolution, what we do is: 1) first apply content divergence resolution 2) then phase divergent resolution on resultant node of 1) case While doing case 1 it is possible that result of merging the two csets would have same changes as public one contains. And then processing the case 2 would create an empty commit which is not something we want to do. So this patch catch that same case when merging results in same as public cset and don't create a new node, instead to solve the divergence it just add a obsmarker from "other divergent" to "public divergent" i.e. [other, (public,)] Next patch will add the continue case handling for this same case. This patch also adds the tests for the different cases which are possible for the above mentioned case. There is test for continue case too which is broken in this patch and will be fixed in next patch.
Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:08:58 +0530 evolve: rename npublicdiv to publicnode
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:08:58 +0530] rev 4415
evolve: rename npublicdiv to publicnode In next patches it would make more sense to use publicnode instead of npublicdiv.
Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:02:18 +0530 evolve: in pubdiv resolution make sure that transaction get closed
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 02:02:18 +0530] rev 4414
evolve: in pubdiv resolution make sure that transaction get closed Before this patch it could be possible that transaction won't get closed if res is False in the pubic divergence resolution when continuing the hg evolve.
Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:50:24 +0530 evolve: pin the public cset to local side in merging when solving public div
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 25 Feb 2019 22:50:24 +0530] rev 4413
evolve: pin the public cset to local side in merging when solving public div While working on public divergence, I think it would be better to pin the public cset to local side of merge for understanding and handling the future cases without any ambiguity. Changes in tests reflect the changed behaviour.
Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:47:14 +0530 evolve: add tests of relocation case in public divergence
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 23 Feb 2019 00:47:14 +0530] rev 4412
evolve: add tests of relocation case in public divergence These tests cover the cases when "other" is behind the "public" one and we would have to relocate "other" here. It covers all the conflicting and non-conflicting cases.
Sun, 03 Mar 2019 16:29:32 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Mar 2019 16:29:32 +0100] rev 4411
branching: merge with stable
Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:43:14 +0530 split: make sure hg split preserve the phase of splitting cset (issue6048) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:43:14 +0530] rev 4410
split: make sure hg split preserve the phase of splitting cset (issue6048) Before this patch, while splitting we were not taking the phase of splitting cset into account. By default new commits would have draft changes. As we know there can two possible phases i.e draft and secret in rewriting csets thing, so this adds the handling of secret phase (as default is draft) Changes in test file reflect the added behaviour.
Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:37:04 +0530 split: add tests which demonstrate the issue6048 stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 02 Mar 2019 01:37:04 +0530] rev 4409
split: add tests which demonstrate the issue6048 Next patch will fix this issue.
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:01:06 +0530 evolve: fix the broken behaviour on div resolution in relocation case
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Feb 2019 21:01:06 +0530] rev 4408
evolve: fix the broken behaviour on div resolution in relocation case In content divergence resolution, I see that when "relocationreq" is True which means both the cset are on different parent and relocation is required. In this case when "divergent" is the one who is behind the "other" cset in DAG, we swap them. At this point one thing we missed is to update the evolvestate['divergent']. Because of this in continue case we didn't get the right value of obsmarkers creation. In this patch I added the code to update the evolvestate when we swap them. Now as we know "divergent" and "other" can be swapped in some cases, it is better to store the intial divergent separately in evolvestate which is evolvestate['orig-divergent'] and later this value is used to update the evolvestate['replacements'] which is the track of revisions which has been resolved. Changes in tests demonstrate the fixed behaviour.
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:49:37 +0530 evolve: change in a test which demonstrate divergence resolution can break
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:49:37 +0530] rev 4407
evolve: change in a test which demonstrate divergence resolution can break This patch just add "--any" flag to "hg evolve --content-divergent" in a test and changed output reflect that there is something which is not handled correctly. After looking into code I found that it is because of using a evolvestate value which is not updated i.e evolvestate['divergent'] Next patch will fix this problem.
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:57:18 +0530 tests: update the title of a test as it's not what it says
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Feb 2019 23:57:18 +0530] rev 4406
tests: update the title of a test as it's not what it says I see that this test has conflict in relocation and in merging also. We do have a test for the case when only relocation leads to conflict.
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:29 +0800 obsexchange: avoid importing io/StringIO module with a different name
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:29 +0800] rev 4405
obsexchange: avoid importing io/StringIO module with a different name Since we're not interested in the whole module, let's shorten the imports and aviod the lint warnings. Otherwise pep8-naming complains: - import io as StringIO: N812 lowercase imported as non lowercase - import StringIO as io: N813 camelcase imported as lowercase
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:05 +0800 evolve: remove unused StringIO import
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:56:05 +0800] rev 4404
evolve: remove unused StringIO import
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:39:10 +0800 evolve: unindent some lines caught by flake8
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 21:39:10 +0800] rev 4403
evolve: unindent some lines caught by flake8 The message was: "E117 over-indented".
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:46:57 +0100 branching: overwrite broken merge with a correct one
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 12:46:57 +0100] rev 4402
branching: overwrite broken merge with a correct one Thanks goes to Anton Shestakov for spotting and fixing this.
Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:18:17 +0800 branching: merge with stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 13 Feb 2019 19:18:17 +0800] rev 4401
branching: merge with stable
Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:03:14 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 12 Feb 2019 15:03:14 +0100] rev 4400
branching: merge with stable
Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:33:02 +0800 obshistory: omit keyword arguments with default values in patch.diffui() calls stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 11 Feb 2019 21:33:02 +0800] rev 4399
obshistory: omit keyword arguments with default values in patch.diffui() calls d4c9eebdd72d made that function not take "relroot" and "prefix" anymore, and instead expect "pathfn". These two chunks of code in this patch simply generate patches for obslog -p and they broke because they tried to provide default values for "prefix" and "relroot" for no apparent reason (and also for "changes"). Let's instead rely on defaults of patch.diffui().
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:52:49 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 17:52:49 +0100] rev 4398
branching: merge with stable
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:21:09 +0100 test: wider another time matching in prev/next lock testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 10:21:09 +0100] rev 4397
test: wider another time matching in prev/next lock testing There does not seems to be a reasons for specifically matching 4-6 seconds. Wider matching will avoid intermittent failure.
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:29:54 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:29:54 +0100] rev 4396
branching: merge with stable
Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:26:48 +0100 test: wider time matching in prev/next lock testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 08 Feb 2019 09:26:48 +0100] rev 4395
test: wider time matching in prev/next lock testing There does not seems to be a reasons for specifically matching 4-6 seconds. Wider matching will avoid intermittent failure.
Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000 topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor
Martijn Pieters <mj@octobus.net> [Wed, 21 Nov 2018 12:00:46 +0000] rev 4394
topic: make topics compatible with branchmap refactor See https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5290
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:03:00 -0800 prompts: use 1-indexing in revselectionprompt()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 30 Jan 2019 10:03:00 -0800] rev 4393
prompts: use 1-indexing in revselectionprompt() The consumer is generally a human, not a computer. I've made the mistake of entering "1" instead of "0" a few times myself.
Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:24:59 +0800 test-split: split now ignores diff.* settings
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Thu, 07 Feb 2019 16:24:59 +0800] rev 4392
test-split: split now ignores diff.* settings From 66399f2e92aa: "It is assumed by the author that the `[diff]` section is primarily for *viewing* diffs, and that it is unlikely what people intend when attempting to commit or revert."
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 17:03:02 +0530 pick: add --tool for hg pick to specify mergetool
Sangeet Kumar Mishra <mail2sangeetmishra@gmail.com> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 17:03:02 +0530] rev 4391
pick: add --tool for hg pick to specify mergetool This patch used configuration override to enable you to pass a mergetool via the --tool flag in case there is any merge conflict.
Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:49:29 +0800 revset: use getintrange() to parse relation subscript
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 06 Feb 2019 13:49:29 +0800] rev 4390
revset: use getintrange() to parse relation subscript After 13f7a6a4f0db parsing the tokens into usable values needs to happen inside subscript relation functions.
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 12:04:50 +0100 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 12:04:50 +0100] rev 4389
branching: merge with stable
Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:38:48 +0530 compat: pass contexts to _findlimit() (issue6066) stable
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 31 Jan 2019 15:38:48 +0530] rev 4388
compat: pass contexts to _findlimit() (issue6066) Now _findlimit() in copies module accept context instead of rev number. See https://phab.mercurial-scm.org/D5595
Sun, 03 Feb 2019 08:10:48 +0100 packaging: fix debian changelog stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 03 Feb 2019 08:10:48 +0100] rev 4387
packaging: fix debian changelog
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:45:40 +0100 changelog: add relevant entries
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 30 Jan 2019 04:45:40 +0100] rev 4386
changelog: add relevant entries
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:40:10 +0530 evolve: add test for the case where public divergence on difference parents
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 18:40:10 +0530] rev 4385
evolve: add test for the case where public divergence on difference parents This test make sure that public divergence resolution also handle the case when divergentes changeset does not share the same parent at one end because one end simply rebase. The other side has actual an actual diff change. For now this would work only for the case when we need to relocate the mutable one. Other case is still left to work on.
Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:10 +0530 evolve: update the public divergence resolution logic to cover --continue case
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:10 +0530] rev 4384
evolve: update the public divergence resolution logic to cover --continue case To continue the interrupted evolve in case of public divergence: we will have to store the node of that public cset which was in content divergence with the other cset, so that we can perform the phase divergence resolution between that public cset and a newnode which is the result of content-divergence resolution. Added tests reflect the behaviour this patch adds.
Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:34 +0530 evolve: add logic to resolve content-divergence with a public cset
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 21 Jan 2019 23:06:34 +0530] rev 4383
evolve: add logic to resolve content-divergence with a public cset Public content-divergence is the divergence where a cset is content-divergent with a public cset. To solve public divergence: 1) perform content-divergent resolution 2) resultant node is phase divergent 3) perform phase divergence resolution It is the intial logic to solve public divergence. Next patches will be the covering the cases of: 1) relocation: when we need to relocate to node 2) continue: to add this resolution in case of --continue 3) the case when content-divergence resolution gives a result similar to public cset. Added test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t reflect the added behaviour.
Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:33:19 +0530 evolve: introduce function to create a obsmarker relation even for public cset
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sun, 13 Jan 2019 19:33:19 +0530] rev 4382
evolve: introduce function to create a obsmarker relation even for public cset To create obsmarkers we use obsolete.createmarkers() function, but because of security reasons this function refuses to create obsmarkers for public cset. And we need to create obsmarkers for a public cset while solving public content divergence. So introducing this function which create a obsmarker relation even for immutable cset. Currently this function create obsmarker for a single relation, in contrast of obsolete.createmarkers() which create markers for multiple relations. Upcoming pathces will be using this function.
Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:45:14 +0800 topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#stack[1:2]'
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 29 Jan 2019 20:45:14 +0800] rev 4381
topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#stack[1:2]'
Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:31:31 +0800 topic: simplify #stack index check/access
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 28 Jan 2019 22:31:31 +0800] rev 4380
topic: simplify #stack index check/access Also using stack.revs instead of list(stack). It's equivalent and stack.revs is @propertycache'd.
Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:39:09 +0800 topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#topic[1:2]'
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 27 Jan 2019 17:39:09 +0800] rev 4379
topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#topic[1:2]' Since #topic is very similar to #generations, we reuse the function directly. Few tests because #generations is already tested in core.
Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:51:36 +0530 evolve: add description of function solveobswdp
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 25 Jan 2019 16:51:36 +0530] rev 4378
evolve: add description of function solveobswdp
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:11:36 -0800 evolve: document the "if not shouldupdate" block
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 12:11:36 -0800] rev 4377
evolve: document the "if not shouldupdate" block I missed the "not" in "if not shouldupdate: ... hg.updaterepo()" and it took a long time for me to realize it's about updating *back* to the original commit (or to its successor). Let's add a comment to maybe help the person not make the same mistake.
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:55:20 -0800 evolve: make "startnode" consistently be a node, not a context
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 11:55:20 -0800] rev 4376
evolve: make "startnode" consistently be a node, not a context This fixes a bug where we didn't print "working directory is not at ..." after `hg evolve --continue` because we were comparing a node and a context.
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:36:29 -0800 evolve: use context managers for locks and transaction
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 22:36:29 -0800] rev 4375
evolve: use context managers for locks and transaction
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:17:58 -0800 prune: use scmutil.cleanupnodes()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:17:58 -0800] rev 4374
prune: use scmutil.cleanupnodes()
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:45:16 -0800 uncommit: use scmtutil.cleanupnodes()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:45:16 -0800] rev 4373
uncommit: use scmtutil.cleanupnodes()
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:33:02 -0800 amend: use scmutil.cleanupnodes() with --patch
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:33:02 -0800] rev 4372
amend: use scmutil.cleanupnodes() with --patch
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:32:44 -0800 pick: use scmutil.cleanupnodes()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 10:32:44 -0800] rev 4371
pick: use scmutil.cleanupnodes() A side-effect is that `pick` should now also move bookmarks.
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:45:25 -0800 fold: use scmutil.cleanupnodes()
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 09:45:25 -0800] rev 4370
fold: use scmutil.cleanupnodes() scmutil.cleanupnodes() has existed since 4.3 and had the metadata argument since 4.4, so we can now safely depend on it.
Sat, 26 Jan 2019 23:58:18 +0800 revset: subscriptrelations functions now have two bounds
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sat, 26 Jan 2019 23:58:18 +0800] rev 4369
revset: subscriptrelations functions now have two bounds
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:49:44 -0500 branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:49:44 -0500] rev 4368
branching: merge with stable A new version has been released
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:48:44 -0500 packaging: mark as development version stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:48:44 -0500] rev 4367
packaging: mark as development version
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:46:38 -0500 Added tag 8.4.0 for changeset 8c4289d0e91e stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 15:46:38 -0500] rev 4366
Added tag 8.4.0 for changeset 8c4289d0e91e
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:25:36 -0500 packaging: prepare release 8.4.0 stable 8.4.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 20:25:36 -0500] rev 4365
packaging: prepare release 8.4.0
Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:05:12 -0500 minitopic: add warning about extensions state and testing stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Wed, 23 Jan 2019 09:05:12 -0500] rev 4364
minitopic: add warning about extensions state and testing
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:57:25 -0500 test-compat: merge mercurial-4.5 into mercurial-4.4 mercurial-4.4
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:57:25 -0500] rev 4363
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.5 into mercurial-4.4
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:55:09 -0500 test-compat: merge mercurial-4.6 into mercurial-4.5 mercurial-4.5
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:55:09 -0500] rev 4362
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.6 into mercurial-4.5
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:59:33 -0500 branching: closing test-compat branch for mercurial-4.3 mercurial-4.3
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:59:33 -0500] rev 4361
branching: closing test-compat branch for mercurial-4.3 We are dropping support for this version.
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:54:44 -0500 test-compat: merge mercurial-4.7 into mercurial-4.6 mercurial-4.6
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:54:44 -0500] rev 4360
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.7 into mercurial-4.6
Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:54:43 -0500 test-compat: merge mercurial-4.8 into mercurial-4.7 mercurial-4.7
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 22 Jan 2019 12:54:43 -0500] rev 4359
test-compat: merge mercurial-4.8 into mercurial-4.7
(0) -3000 -1000 -120 +120 tip