Sat, 10 Nov 2018 23:54:46 -0500 compat: drop Mercurial 4.3 support for exthelper
Matt Harbison <matt_harbison@yahoo.com> [Sat, 10 Nov 2018 23:54:46 -0500] rev 4254
compat: drop Mercurial 4.3 support for exthelper The last release email noted plans to drop 4.3 and 4.4 support in the next feature release. I'd like to move this code into core, and dropping this should allow the class to be copied in unmodified.
Mon, 19 Nov 2018 01:49:34 +0000 compat: update metadata about minimum ag version
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Nov 2018 01:49:34 +0000] rev 4253
compat: update metadata about minimum ag version
Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:41:50 +0530 next: solve the issue of `next` get confused by split
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 06 Nov 2018 10:41:50 +0530] rev 4252
next: solve the issue of `next` get confused by split This patch solve a problem of next command which get confused by split. Let me describe how it was getting confused: Initial state of repo: A---B---C After splitting B to (B1,B2): @ A---B1---B2 \ ---B---C X * (note: C is orphan; checkedout to B1) Lets make an amend on B1: @ B1' / A---B1---B2 \ X * \ ---B---C X * Now, if run `hg next` (--evolve is True by default now): $ it would give you choice to choose from B2 and C thinking that C could also be a possbile children for B1, instead of stablizing B2 on B1. I fixed this problem by filtering those aspiring children which can be stablized on one of the aspiring children itself. Changes made in test-prev-next.t shows the changed expected behaviour.
Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:10:56 +0530 next: add test which shows that `next` get confused by split
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Tue, 06 Nov 2018 15:10:56 +0530] rev 4251
next: add test which shows that `next` get confused by split
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:08:56 +0530 cleanup: avoid a Yoda condition
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:08:56 +0530] rev 4250
cleanup: avoid a Yoda condition
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:06:17 +0530 evolve: modify and move the comment to appropriate position
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:06:17 +0530] rev 4249
evolve: modify and move the comment to appropriate position
Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:01:58 +0530 next: update the command description
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 31 Oct 2018 14:01:58 +0530] rev 4248
next: update the command description Now, if necessary next command evolve the next child revision by defualt. You don't need to pass the --evolve flag.
Sat, 10 Nov 2018 15:50:05 +0100 next: make next command --evolve by default
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 10 Nov 2018 15:50:05 +0100] rev 4247
next: make next command --evolve by default Before this patch, if we need to evolve to update to the next child, we were suggesting the user to use --evolve flag. This patch make some changes to evolve by default in that conditions. After making next command to evolve by default we have to consider the following points: 1) If we don't need to evolve while updating to the next child: a) And if wdir is dirty, we suggest to use --merge flag b) if wdir is clean, we simply update to next child (if ambiguous, prompt the user to select one) 2) If we need to evolve: a) when wdir is dirty, we suggest the user to use `hg shelve` first, to make wdir clean. As we don't support --merge while evovling. b) when wdir is clean, we evolve the next cset. Changes made in test-prev-next.t reflect the changed behaviour.
Mon, 05 Nov 2018 19:56:33 +0800 safeguard: allow push to succeed (and without warning) with --publish
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 05 Nov 2018 19:56:33 +0800] rev 4246
safeguard: allow push to succeed (and without warning) with --publish
Sun, 04 Nov 2018 22:06:23 +0800 topic: only add --publish flag to push if it's not already there
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Sun, 04 Nov 2018 22:06:23 +0800] rev 4245
topic: only add --publish flag to push if it's not already there
Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:04:01 +0800 safeguard: check auto-publish value before sending listkeys command
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Mon, 05 Nov 2018 16:04:01 +0800] rev 4244
safeguard: check auto-publish value before sending listkeys command Always sending listkeys command is just wasteful, let's first make sure users even care about auto-publish behavior.
Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:54:28 +0100 style: silence another flak8 warning
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 10 Nov 2018 17:54:28 +0100] rev 4243
style: silence another flak8 warning Default should be green now.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -12 +12 +100 +300 +1000 tip