stablerange: directly use 'self' when possible Code movement introduced multiple silly case were we where accessing 'self' though 'repo.stablerange' for no good reasons.

revsfromrange: set the cache for the multiple bottom ranges in merge slicing We no longer rely on the object magic here.

revsfromrange: set the cache for the single bottom range in merge slicing We no longer rely on the object magic here.

revsfromrange: set the cache for the top range in merge slicing We no longer rely on the object magic here.

revsfromrange: remove reference to '_revs' in merge slicing Given '_revs' is a property from the cache, we use the official method of the object we are on instead. That method should be using the same cache than the property if available.

revsfromcache: update cache for the top slice if possible Same logic, we update the cache if have the data.

revsfromrange: skip setting the cache for length-1 top entry The content of the range is trivial to compute.

revsfromrange: update cache for parentrange directly in the code We update it where it matters if we detect that we have the data.

revsfromramge: hard code the single changeset range case That case is trivial and triggering and full stable sort for it seems a bit silly.

stablerange: introduce caching for the full revision in a set Such cache proved handy in the "per-range" class so we carry it along to the unified class. cf documentation for details.