Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:04:20 +0200 rewind: add a message about obsolete changeset
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 01:04:20 +0200] rev 3862
rewind: add a message about obsolete changeset Not the best output, but useful to have the data. We can improve that later.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:15:18 +0200 rewind: obsolete latest successors unless instructed otherwise
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:15:18 +0200] rev 3861
rewind: obsolete latest successors unless instructed otherwise To prevent the creations of divergence, we automatically mark the successors set of the rewinded changeset as obsoleted by the rewind result. A new flag `--as-divergence` is added to disable this behavior.
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:32:22 +0200 rewind: test rewinding an amended changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:32:22 +0200] rev 3860
rewind: test rewinding an amended changesets We are now able to rewind a simple amended changeset. For now, its current successors has not been obsoleted and we created divergence.
Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:57:09 +0200 rewind: add a message about the rewinded changesets
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 17 Jun 2018 00:57:09 +0200] rev 3859
rewind: add a message about the rewinded changesets This helps to understand what happened.
Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:11:52 +0200 rewind: add a proto version of the command
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sat, 16 Jun 2018 23:11:52 +0200] rev 3858
rewind: add a proto version of the command This first version focus on rewinding a single revision without care for the consequence.
Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:56 +0200 stablesort: make sure heads are processed in sorted order
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Fri, 29 Jun 2018 16:51:56 +0200] rev 3857
stablesort: make sure heads are processed in sorted order changeset 72621094505f will fix some ordering issue in the `heads` revset so we stabilise the output in advance.
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:54 +0530 evolve: move the bookmarks also when updating to successor (issue5923)
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:54 +0530] rev 3856
evolve: move the bookmarks also when updating to successor (issue5923) When we are on an obsolete node and does `hg evolve`, it updates to it's sucessor, however it does not move the bookmark to the successor. This patch adds logic to make sure we move the bookmark too. Test change demonstrates the fix.
Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:44 +0530 tests: add test to demonstrate issue5923
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 19 Jun 2018 23:21:44 +0530] rev 3855
tests: add test to demonstrate issue5923 This will be fixed in upcoming patch.
Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:26:16 +0200 changelog: add an entry about the new `evolve.interrupted` section
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 28 Jun 2018 17:26:16 +0200] rev 3854
changelog: add an entry about the new `evolve.interrupted` section
Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:50:17 +0530 evolve: make one missed error to align other error messages
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:50:17 +0530] rev 3853
evolve: make one missed error to align other error messages Previous patches missed this error to change it to the new format. Let's align this with all other messages raised by `hg evolve` command.
Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:16:29 +0530 evolve: raise error.InterventionRequired instead of Abort when conflicts
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 15 Jun 2018 00:16:29 +0530] rev 3852
evolve: raise error.InterventionRequired instead of Abort when conflicts error.InterventionRequired is a better error to raise in such cases. Thanks to marmoute for noticing this.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:58:30 +0200 changelog: add a changelog entry about divergence resolution
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 02:58:30 +0200] rev 3851
changelog: add a changelog entry about divergence resolution We made a lots of progress there.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:33 +0530 evolve: create resolved cset on successors of current parents
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:33 +0530] rev 3850
evolve: create resolved cset on successors of current parents While resolving content-divergence, sometimes, the parent can be obsolete and have a successor. We should consider the successors of the parents instead of obsolete parents as that will do something like orphan+content-divergence resolution both at the same time which is powerful and results in a single stack while resolving content-divergence of stacks. The test changes demonstrates that we can now successfully evolve a content divergent stack.
Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:11 +0530 tests: fix a test case to not create conflicts
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Thu, 14 Jun 2018 01:39:11 +0530] rev 3849
tests: fix a test case to not create conflicts This is the test case where we are testing about divergence resolution of stack of patches. If the stack is as follows: C1 C2 | | B1 B2 | | A1 A2 \/ base And A1-A2, B1-B2 and C1-C2 are content-divergent, and merging A1-A2 results in conflicts. Now if you resolve conflicts and continue resoling B1-B2, the conflicts of A1-A2 will still be there. We need somehow to understand the work we has done and not create conflicts again. To test the evolution functionality for now, we make sure conflicts does not occur.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -14 +14 +100 +300 +1000 tip