Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:53:04 +0100 topic: use more protective code to access current topic stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:53:04 +0100] rev 3227
topic: use more protective code to access current topic There are some code path where the operation is not properly initialized and lack the new attributes. While the lack of initialization, is suspicious and I've not be able to pin point case where this happens. Currently the code crash when it encounter this situation. So we make the code more resistant to this case to prevent bad user experience.
Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:21:57 +0100 topic: use more protective code to access publishing code stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 05 Dec 2017 13:21:57 +0100] rev 3226
topic: use more protective code to access publishing code There are some code path where the operation is not properly initialized and lack the new attributes. While the lack of initialization, is suspicious and I've not be able to pin point case where this happens. Currently the code crash when it encounter this situation. So we make the code more resistant to this case to prevent bad user experience.
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:27:27 -0800 typos: fix typos in several locations
Kyle Lippincott <spectral@google.com> [Mon, 04 Dec 2017 14:27:27 -0800] rev 3225
typos: fix typos in several locations A user at Google attempted to fix our local copy because they had noticed a typo (accross instead of across), but this will just get overwritten on our next import. This commit fixes that case and a few others that my editor found. Most of the typos were in comments, but user-visible output is changed in a few cases: - accross -> across - splitted -> split - ambigious -> ambiguous - evolvestte -> evolvestate (this is in a ui.debug, so not often seen) There is another typo that I wanted to fix, but didn't: 'supercede' is spelled 'superseed' in a few locations. I believe this is only internal to the extension, instead of being user-visible, so while it could probably be fixed easily, I wasn't 100% sure it didn't end up in a file on disk or something and might cause problems, so I left it alone.
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:16:01 +0530 tests: add a test for newline in obsnote
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Dec 2017 17:16:01 +0530] rev 3224
tests: add a test for newline in obsnote
Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:50:32 +0530 obsnote: don't add '' to note while showing it in obslog
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Dec 2017 15:50:32 +0530] rev 3223
obsnote: don't add '' to note while showing it in obslog
Sun, 03 Dec 2017 23:40:08 +0530 obsnote: add an entry in CHANGELOG about it
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 03 Dec 2017 23:40:08 +0530] rev 3222
obsnote: add an entry in CHANGELOG about it
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:47 +0530 amend: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:47 +0530] rev 3221
amend: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:31 +0530 uncommit: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:31 +0530] rev 3220
uncommit: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:20 +0530 fold: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:20 +0530] rev 3219
fold: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:08 +0530 metaedit: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:14:08 +0530] rev 3218
metaedit: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:13:52 +0530 prune: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:13:52 +0530] rev 3217
prune: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:06:06 +0530 split: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 17 Nov 2017 03:06:06 +0530] rev 3216
split: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:54:13 +0530 touch: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:54:13 +0530] rev 3215
touch: add support for storing a note in obsmarker
Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:35:51 +0530 obslog: add initial support for showing note in obslog
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:35:51 +0530] rev 3214
obslog: add initial support for showing note in obslog This add a very basic and initial support for showing the note stored in the obsmarker in obslog to test the upcoming changes which adds support. The UI is not finalised and will be improved in the patches after support is added and we have tests with the current output.
Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:26:30 +0530 cmdrewrite: add a utility function to make sure note is of valid format
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 12 Nov 2017 01:26:30 +0530] rev 3213
cmdrewrite: add a utility function to make sure note is of valid format Upcoming patches will add support to store a note on various evolution related commands by storing that in obsmarker. Since the obsmarker metadata field can't store things above 255 bytes, this patch introduces a function which will be used to make sure note is under 255 bytes and does not contain newlines. We don't want notes to be multilines.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -15 +15 +100 +300 +1000 tip