Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:25:28 +0200 test-compat: merge stable into mercurial-4.6 mercurial-4.6
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:25:28 +0200] rev 3993
test-compat: merge stable into mercurial-4.6
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:18:52 +0200 changelog: add a line about improved prune documentation stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:18:52 +0200] rev 3992
changelog: add a line about improved prune documentation
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:17:27 +0200 changelog: reorder content stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 13:17:27 +0200] rev 3991
changelog: reorder content
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:13:28 +0200 prune: more human-friendly documentation stable
Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <dan@magenta.dk> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:13:28 +0200] rev 3990
prune: more human-friendly documentation The previous help string generally had a highly technical language. I've tried my best to address that.
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:14:04 +0200 prune: improve help first line stable
Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <dan@magenta.dk> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:14:04 +0200] rev 3989
prune: improve help first line The previous help string for prune didn't mention successors in the first line. Note: Pierre-Yves David changed the original "hidden" to "obsolete" as it is better concept to put forward. (a bit more specific and with more consequence than just "hidden"). We need a good `hg help obsolete/obsolescence` result. We'll try to get this in the next version.
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:21:05 +0200 prune: try to clarify the "multi" revisions case stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:21:05 +0200] rev 3988
prune: try to clarify the "multi" revisions case I hope this highlight the use case for all three options.
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:21:59 +0200 prune: move help about biject after the one about split and fold stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:21:59 +0200] rev 3987
prune: move help about biject after the one about split and fold The --biject flag seems a less common use case.
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:18:11 +0200 prune: no longer consider dropping --biject stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:18:11 +0200] rev 3986
prune: no longer consider dropping --biject Field testing show it save people one wrong call often enough that it is worth keeping.
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:13:01 +0200 prune: more human-friendly documentation for --biject stable
Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <dan@magenta.dk> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 12:13:01 +0200] rev 3985
prune: more human-friendly documentation for --biject
Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:56:49 +0200 prune: use ``-s/--succ`` in documentation stable
Dan Villiom Podlaski Christiansen <dan@magenta.dk> [Tue, 21 Aug 2018 11:56:49 +0200] rev 3984
prune: use ``-s/--succ`` in documentation Extracted by Pierre-Yves David
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 tip