changelog: add relevant entries

evolve: add test for the case where public divergence on difference parents This test make sure that public divergence resolution also handle the case when divergentes changeset does not share the same parent at one end because one end simply rebase. The other side has actual an actual diff change. For now this would work only for the case when we need to relocate the mutable one. Other case is still left to work on.

evolve: update the public divergence resolution logic to cover --continue case To continue the interrupted evolve in case of public divergence: we will have to store the node of that public cset which was in content divergence with the other cset, so that we can perform the phase divergence resolution between that public cset and a newnode which is the result of content-divergence resolution. Added tests reflect the behaviour this patch adds.

evolve: add logic to resolve content-divergence with a public cset Public content-divergence is the divergence where a cset is content-divergent with a public cset. To solve public divergence: 1) perform content-divergent resolution 2) resultant node is phase divergent 3) perform phase divergence resolution It is the intial logic to solve public divergence. Next patches will be the covering the cases of: 1) relocation: when we need to relocate to node 2) continue: to add this resolution in case of --continue 3) the case when content-divergence resolution gives a result similar to public cset. Added test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t reflect the added behaviour.

evolve: introduce function to create a obsmarker relation even for public cset To create obsmarkers we use obsolete.createmarkers() function, but because of security reasons this function refuses to create obsmarkers for public cset. And we need to create obsmarkers for a public cset while solving public content divergence. So introducing this function which create a obsmarker relation even for immutable cset. Currently this function create obsmarker for a single relation, in contrast of obsolete.createmarkers() which create markers for multiple relations. Upcoming pathces will be using this function.

topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#stack[1:2]'

topic: simplify #stack index check/access Also using stack.revs instead of list(stack). It's equivalent and stack.revs is @propertycache'd.

topic: make ranges work in revset relations like 'foo#topic[1:2]' Since #topic is very similar to #generations, we reuse the function directly. Few tests because #generations is already tested in core.

evolve: add description of function solveobswdp

evolve: document the "if not shouldupdate" block I missed the "not" in "if not shouldupdate: ... hg.updaterepo()" and it took a long time for me to realize it's about updating *back* to the original commit (or to its successor). Let's add a comment to maybe help the person not make the same mistake.