Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0700] rev 4446
touch: use action "touch", not "<function touch at ...>", in precheck
I just got this message:
abort: cannot <function touch at 0x7fde174b69b0> public changesets: f177c51ae98f
It has been this way since 1b7b9acda2a9 (touch: use precheck to
validate revision, 2017-07-23).
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:44:44 -0700] rev 4445
prune: use action "prune", not "touch", in precheck
We have been using "touch" since 06ee4ec88190 (prune: use precheck to
validate revision, 2017-07-23). That commit modified the tests, so it
kind seemed intentional, but I suspect it was still just an oversight.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:12 +0530] rev 4444
evolve: test a common case of public divergence
evolve: in pubdiv, handle the case when public branch is behind the mutable
In public divergence, when public branch is behind the mutable one the behaviour
that this patch added is that we relocate the draft one to public side.
This should be fine in most case, but might be an issue in some other (eg, when
the draft side of the divergence is rebase away from ancestors it relies on.)
Test written by Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>