Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:14:39 +0530 next: prompt user to choose child in ambiguity in `hg next --evolve`
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:14:39 +0530] rev 3549
next: prompt user to choose child in ambiguity in `hg next --evolve` This patch makes `hg next --evolve` prompt user to choose a child to evolve and update when multiple of them exists. This is improvement over previous behavior where we used to error out saying ambiguous next unstable changeset and told user to manually use `hg evolve -r rev`. While writing this patch, I am personally very happy to have this feature as I have encountered this stage many times and I wanted `next --evolve` to take care of that. It uses the revselectionprompt thing added in earlier patches.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:56:50 +0530 next: move logic to evolve the children to it's own function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:56:50 +0530] rev 3548
next: move logic to evolve the children to it's own function This patch moves the logic which evolves the children and updates to it in `hg next --evolve` to it's own function as we want to use that again.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:46:47 +0530 next: prompt user to choose a children in case of ambiguity
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:46:47 +0530] rev 3547
next: prompt user to choose a children in case of ambiguity This patch adds functionality to prompt user and ask the children to which next should move to incase of multiple childrens. This is a very nice UI because otherwise user has to lookup changeset hash, and then manually do `hg update` to that. In this case we show hash and description so user can choose which one to update easily. It is using the interactive revision choosing functionality added in a previous patch.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:31:13 +0530 next: show changeset hash in `--dry-run` instead of rev numbers
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:31:13 +0530] rev 3546
next: show changeset hash in `--dry-run` instead of rev numbers Rev numbers can change, hence we should show rev hash instead of rev numbers in dry-run.
Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:27:02 +0530 evolve: make sure we consider all cases in if-else
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:27:02 +0530] rev 3545
evolve: make sure we consider all cases in if-else The part of code which is touched decides on evolution of merge changeset. We need proper handling of each case there, so before adding logic, let's add conditional for each case so that upcoming patches are easy to understand.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:03:41 +0100 tests: add more cases about stabilization of an orphaned merge commit
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:03:41 +0100] rev 3544
tests: add more cases about stabilization of an orphaned merge commit This patch adds three more cases related to stabilization of orphaned merge commits.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100 evolve: fix missing negation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100] rev 3543
evolve: fix missing negation Spotted by Pulkit Goyal.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:01:07 +0100 evolve: clarify message for ambiguous destination from split
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:01:07 +0100] rev 3542
evolve: clarify message for ambiguous destination from split Message is a bit long, but should be less scary.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -8 +8 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 tip