Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:58:26 +0700 obshistory: implement predecessorsandmarkers() for obsorigin draft
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:58:26 +0700] rev 5254
obshistory: implement predecessorsandmarkers() for obsorigin
Sun, 02 Feb 2020 11:06:21 +0100 fold: proposal for output improvement draft
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 02 Feb 2020 11:06:21 +0100] rev 5253
fold: proposal for output improvement Listing other changeset we got folded with seems like a good idea. We need to think about the case where changesets we got folded with is filtered.
Fri, 27 Dec 2019 20:40:13 -0800 obslog: add display of precursor information to the default template draft
Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp <rdamazio@google.com> [Fri, 27 Dec 2019 20:40:13 -0800] rev 5252
obslog: add display of precursor information to the default template This will still only be output when the user passes --precursors to the command (otherwise the data just won't be there). This addresses a common user request, where they actually would find more intuitive to use --precursors --no-successors.
Fri, 27 Dec 2019 20:38:10 -0800 obslog: add flags to control the output of precursors and successors draft
Rodrigo Damazio Bovendorp <rdamazio@google.com> [Fri, 27 Dec 2019 20:38:10 -0800] rev 5251
obslog: add flags to control the output of precursors and successors With just this change, precursors are only shown in structured output.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -4 +4 +10 +30 +100 tip