Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 01 May 2017 08:05:45 +0200] rev 2294
perf: adds some cache key helper on the obsstore class
This will be useful to allow validating cache depending on obsstore without
parsing the whole obsstore.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Mon, 01 May 2017 06:06:41 +0200] rev 2293
compat: only install the better filtered message for mercurial 4.2 and above
The helper function does not exist in earlier version.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:35:01 +0200] rev 2292
evolve: update extension help
I'm pretty sure there are some missing bits, but this cannot be worse than
before.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 29 Apr 2017 05:44:07 +0200] rev 2291
merge with stable
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:56:09 +0200] rev 2290
ui: change the hidden revision error message
It now display the same details than the warning
when the working directory parent become obsolete
like:
$ hg update 0
abort: hidden revision '0' (successor: f301a99bd857)!
$ hg up 1
abort: hidden revision '1' (pruned)!
$ hg update 0
abort: hidden revision '0' (successors: 91311af6da10, 70653776ec4c)!
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Fri, 28 Apr 2017 16:57:41 +0200] rev 2289
ui: add better messages when the working copy become obsolete.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 28 Apr 2017 15:29:32 +0200] rev 2288
topic: directly use "super" call
That is how one is supposed to do it.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 27 Apr 2017 20:52:09 +0200] rev 2287
repo: properly progate "destroyed" call to super class
The propagation of the 'destroyed' call was dropped. I'm not certain of the
consequences of having a partially broken "destroyed" call, but this can't be
good.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 25 Apr 2017 10:56:55 +0200] rev 2286
safeguard: add an option to disable automatic publishing
Pushing to publishing server by mistake is a bit too common in the current state
of evolve. Especially when the lack of good feature branch story make the use of
-f a bit too common.
So we add a very simple experimental option to allow warning (or abort) when
changeset are pushed to a publishing server. This is unlikely to survive as is,
but this is useful now.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:05:45 +0200] rev 2285
merge back with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 13:04:31 +0200] rev 2284
Added tag 6.0.1 for changeset 5ef112a6eb87
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:59:19 +0200] rev 2283
pkg: prepare release 6.0.1
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:58:27 +0200] rev 2282
debian: finalize 6.0.0 entry
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:54:57 +0200] rev 2281
readme: fix 6.0.0 release date
It was March, not February.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:50:22 +0200] rev 2280
merge with future 6.0.1
Nothing special to report
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:48:31 +0200] rev 2279
merge with future 6.0.1
Nothing special to report
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:45:02 +0200] rev 2278
merge with future 6.0.1
Nothing special to report
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 12:24:43 +0200] rev 2277
checkheads: update tests to match the one in core
These test now exists in core, so we update the evolve version.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:43:57 +0200] rev 2276
serveronly: fix reposetup
The local 'reposetup' function was shadowing the extension helper one. We add a
test for obshashrange using 'serveronly' since this is the item that made use
discover the issue.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:41:20 +0200] rev 2275
extension: simplify the extensions helper hierarchy
If one mode depends on the other, its extensions helper is merged.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 11:40:08 +0200] rev 2274
checkheads: do not overwrite code for Mercurial 4.2 and above
The fix has been ported to Mercurial core as c6cb21ddf74a.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Thu, 20 Apr 2017 00:21:13 +0900] rev 2273
legacy: fix debugrecordpruneparents to call obsstore.create() with keywords
It appears the API was changed twice in Mercurial at
- 570f87422f54 "obsstore: add an explicit `date` argument to obsstore.create"
- adb3798dce49 "obsstore: add a `parents` argument to obsstore.create"
and metadata would be changed to a list of (key, value) pairs. Convert it back
to a dict as expected by create().
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:17:43 +0900] rev 2272
template: adapt to new showlist() API introduced by hg e5eab0fe69ee
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:12:09 +0900] rev 2271
template: pass all mapping data to showlist()
Otherwise a keyword depending on repo or ctx couldn't be rendered.
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:37:28 +0900] rev 2270
make: merge recipes for help
Yuya Nishihara <yuya@tcha.org> [Wed, 19 Apr 2017 21:34:03 +0900] rev 2269
make: fix indent of ifeq-endif
ifeq() can't be a recipe.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:48:20 +0200] rev 2268
tests: update test to match upstreamable version
Name have been clarified, documentation has been updated and some test-case have
been updated to match the intended test.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:45:39 +0200] rev 2267
tests: fix directory names in exchange-D4 test
The test is based on another one and the directory name had not been updated.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 08 Apr 2017 12:43:36 +0200] rev 2266
tests: fix directory names in exchange-D3 test
The test is based on another one and the directory name had not been updated.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Sat, 01 Apr 2017 12:45:18 +0200] rev 2265
merge back with default
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:51:58 +0200] rev 2264
Added tag 6.0.0 for changeset 165ad227993d
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:51:27 +0200] rev 2263
packaging: prepare version 6.0.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:47:31 +0200] rev 2262
merged with future 6.0
No output changed.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:44:10 +0200] rev 2261
test-compat-hg-3.9: merge with future 6.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:39:20 +0200] rev 2260
merge with future 6.0.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:33:59 +0200] rev 2259
merge with default
We are getting close to cutting a 6.0.0
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 14:50:50 +0200] rev 2258
readme: mention the fix for issue4354
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 15:02:39 +0200] rev 2257
checkheads: add a small debug message in case were we give up fast
When node is unknown we assume it will stay. Yet, we might have markers to it
that are going to be pushed. However, we do not have branch (ancestors)
information unless we are very lucky an all of them are pruned. So for now we do
not do anything assuming this will be rare.
We still add a small debug message to help detecting such situation in the
future.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:46:51 +0200] rev 2256
checkheahds: switch algorithm to use pushed markers instead
We now checks if markers involved in the push are relevant to nodes in the
branch we try to replace. The approach is simpler and more robust.
A test showing the limitation of the previous approach is added.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:47:14 +0200] rev 2255
checkheads: add test where the rewrite of the other branch is not direct
This will help testing that our logic is properly transitive.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:45:26 +0200] rev 2254
check-heads: add tests about old heads indirectly pruned
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:50:33 +0200] rev 2253
checkheads: add more complexe case where a branch is split on multiple ones
We extend case A-6 and A-7 with partial counterpart. These case are interesting
because some of the partial pushing will (rightfully) works and some other won't.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 29 Mar 2017 17:35:55 +0200] rev 2252
checkheads: add a test of partially pushing a branch spread on multiple other
If a branch is fully obsolete but is result are spread on multiple branch,
pushing only one of them should detect we create new branches.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Fri, 31 Mar 2017 13:42:28 +0200] rev 2251
checkheads-tests: add missing parents recording for prune markers
It is a bit too easy to forget about theses :/ If they are missing, the
markers are not going to be exchanged on push.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 29 Mar 2017 14:02:46 +0200] rev 2250
checkheads: add some extra tests about "partial push"
This adds a couple of test that checks that the head replacement code is
properly ignored replacement not relevant to the push.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 29 Mar 2017 15:48:27 +0200] rev 2249
checkheads: handle partial obsolescence
We now properly detects situations were only parts of the remote branch is
obsoleted. To do so, we process children in the branch recursively to see if
they will be obsolete.
The current code has some trouble when the remote branch in unknown locally, or
when the prune happened on a successors that is not relevant to the push. These
case will be handled later.
The processing code is becoming more and more complex, a lighter approach would
be to check for the obsolescence markers that are relevant to the pushed set,
but I prefer to stick with the current approach until more test cases are
written.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Wed, 29 Mar 2017 16:41:42 +0200] rev 2248
test: force a push in inhibit's test
Our checkheads detection code is becoming better and will prevent that push. As
we do not care about this for inhibit, we simply force the push.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@ens-lyon.org> [Tue, 21 Mar 2017 12:30:53 +0100] rev 2247
checkheads: basic handling of pruned heads (and associated tests)
We now detect that heads was pruned and stop warning about it. Note that this
has the same shortcoming as the existing code and only looks at the heads.