Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Wed, 20 Mar 2019 09:19:02 -0700] rev 4453
evolve: clarify output when phase-divergence resolution results in no change
I found it pretty confusing that it said "committed as abcd1234" when
no commit was created.
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:44:05 -0700] rev 4452
tests: reduce dependence on previous tests for setup
The tests in test-evolve-phase-divergence.t built on each other for no
good reason, which makes the tests hard to modify and hard to read.
This patch cleans up some of them. We should clean up the rest too,
but the rest won't matter for my next patch, so I haven't bothered.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Thu, 28 Mar 2019 12:37:55 +0100] rev 4451
branching: merge with stable
Anton Shestakov <av6@dwimlabs.net> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 20:52:30 +0800] rev 4450
topicmap: add compatibility for branchcache that now uses self._entries
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Wed, 27 Mar 2019 14:29:22 +0530] rev 4449
evolve: fix over-idented block
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Tue, 12 Mar 2019 09:48:05 -0700] rev 4448
tests: create "private" repository in already-updated state
I'm going to add more copies of the repo and it's easier to work with
the repo if it's already been updated.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Tue, 26 Mar 2019 11:23:09 +0100] rev 4447
branching: merge with stable
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:45:11 -0700] rev 4446
touch: use action "touch", not "<function touch at ...>", in precheck
I just got this message:
abort: cannot <function touch at 0x7fde174b69b0> public changesets: f177c51ae98f
It has been this way since 1b7b9acda2a9 (touch: use precheck to
validate revision, 2017-07-23).
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Mon, 25 Mar 2019 15:44:44 -0700] rev 4445
prune: use action "prune", not "touch", in precheck
We have been using "touch" since 06ee4ec88190 (prune: use precheck to
validate revision, 2017-07-23). That commit modified the tests, so it
kind seemed intentional, but I suspect it was still just an oversight.
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Sun, 24 Mar 2019 21:30:12 +0530] rev 4444
evolve: test a common case of public divergence
evolve: in pubdiv, handle the case when public branch is behind the mutable
In public divergence, when public branch is behind the mutable one the behaviour
that this patch added is that we relocate the draft one to public side.
This should be fine in most case, but might be an issue in some other (eg, when
the draft side of the divergence is rebase away from ancestors it relies on.)
Test written by Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net>