Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:24:56 +0530 CHANGELOG: add an entry about next and prev being interactive
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:24:56 +0530] rev 3553
CHANGELOG: add an entry about next and prev being interactive
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:24:57 +0530 prev: show changeset hash in --dry-run instead of rev numbers
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:24:57 +0530] rev 3552
prev: show changeset hash in --dry-run instead of rev numbers rev numbers can change, so it's better to show changeset hash.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:21 +0530 prev: prompt user to choose parent in case of multiple parents
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 13:13:21 +0530] rev 3551
prev: prompt user to choose parent in case of multiple parents This patch adds functionality to `hg prev` to prompt user to choose one parent to update when multiple parents exist. Surprisingly there were no tests for this case before this patch, I added one with this patch.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:48:03 +0530 next: cleanup logic around return by returning early
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:48:03 +0530] rev 3550
next: cleanup logic around return by returning early In the cmdnext function, there are some conditionals which returns early and some which sets a result value to be returned later. Let's return from all the conditionals early. There are if, elif and else involved, so it's sure we will end up in one of the conditional, each conditional will return, so it's guranteed that we are returning the correct value and returning everytime.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:14:39 +0530 next: prompt user to choose child in ambiguity in `hg next --evolve`
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 12:14:39 +0530] rev 3549
next: prompt user to choose child in ambiguity in `hg next --evolve` This patch makes `hg next --evolve` prompt user to choose a child to evolve and update when multiple of them exists. This is improvement over previous behavior where we used to error out saying ambiguous next unstable changeset and told user to manually use `hg evolve -r rev`. While writing this patch, I am personally very happy to have this feature as I have encountered this stage many times and I wanted `next --evolve` to take care of that. It uses the revselectionprompt thing added in earlier patches.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:56:50 +0530 next: move logic to evolve the children to it's own function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:56:50 +0530] rev 3548
next: move logic to evolve the children to it's own function This patch moves the logic which evolves the children and updates to it in `hg next --evolve` to it's own function as we want to use that again.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:46:47 +0530 next: prompt user to choose a children in case of ambiguity
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:46:47 +0530] rev 3547
next: prompt user to choose a children in case of ambiguity This patch adds functionality to prompt user and ask the children to which next should move to incase of multiple childrens. This is a very nice UI because otherwise user has to lookup changeset hash, and then manually do `hg update` to that. In this case we show hash and description so user can choose which one to update easily. It is using the interactive revision choosing functionality added in a previous patch.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:31:13 +0530 next: show changeset hash in `--dry-run` instead of rev numbers
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:31:13 +0530] rev 3546
next: show changeset hash in `--dry-run` instead of rev numbers Rev numbers can change, hence we should show rev hash instead of rev numbers in dry-run.
Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:27:02 +0530 evolve: make sure we consider all cases in if-else
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sun, 18 Mar 2018 01:27:02 +0530] rev 3545
evolve: make sure we consider all cases in if-else The part of code which is touched decides on evolution of merge changeset. We need proper handling of each case there, so before adding logic, let's add conditional for each case so that upcoming patches are easy to understand.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:03:41 +0100 tests: add more cases about stabilization of an orphaned merge commit
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 14:03:41 +0100] rev 3544
tests: add more cases about stabilization of an orphaned merge commit This patch adds three more cases related to stabilization of orphaned merge commits.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100 evolve: fix missing negation
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 13:47:07 +0100] rev 3543
evolve: fix missing negation Spotted by Pulkit Goyal.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:01:07 +0100 evolve: clarify message for ambiguous destination from split
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 12:01:07 +0100] rev 3542
evolve: clarify message for ambiguous destination from split Message is a bit long, but should be less scary.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:24:22 +0530 evolve: prompt user to select destination for stabilization in case of split
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:24:22 +0530] rev 3541
evolve: prompt user to select destination for stabilization in case of split This patch adds functionality to prompt user to select a revision when there exists multiple stabilization destination because of split on multiple branches. Test are also added for the feature. I am not sure whether this is the best message which we can show, if people have suggestions I will like to improve the messages shown in prompt.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:36:35 +0530 tests: remove some tests which are moved to dedicated files
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 18:36:35 +0530] rev 3540
tests: remove some tests which are moved to dedicated files The tests in test-unstable.t files are now moved to their dedicated file with all the cases to that in that file. Let's delete them from here.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:24:35 +0530 next: factor out the logic to update to changeset in another function
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 11:24:35 +0530] rev 3539
next: factor out the logic to update to changeset in another function This patch moves the logic to update to children changeset during `hg next` in a separate function because we want to re-use the logic when we will prompt user to choose a changeset in case of multiple childrens.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:59:53 +0530 utility: add a function to prompt user to choose a revision
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:59:53 +0530] rev 3538
utility: add a function to prompt user to choose a revision This patch adds a utility function to interactively prompt user to choose a revision to proceed in cases when there are multiple revisions which are candidates. The function will be used in `hg evolve`, `hg next`, `hg prev` etc. If user feedback will be good, I plan to move it to core and use it at more possible places.
Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:20:20 +0530 tests: add a test about evolve stabilizing orphan caused by splits
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Wed, 14 Mar 2018 17:20:20 +0530] rev 3537
tests: add a test about evolve stabilizing orphan caused by splits There are some similar tests lying around in the test suite but they are not well arranged. I wanted the test suite to be a goto reference for all the behaviors till the time we get all of them documented.
Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:36:55 +0100 test: fix output after rev-branch-cache has been merged
Boris Feld <boris.feld@octobus.net> [Mon, 19 Mar 2018 11:36:55 +0100] rev 3536
test: fix output after rev-branch-cache has been merged Mercurial core 2090044a288d added a new revbranchcache part which changed some exchange-related outputs. Glob them to ease merging with old Mercurial versions branches.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:13:33 -0700 cleanup: remove duplicate import of "obsolete"
Martin von Zweigbergk <martinvonz@google.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 09:13:33 -0700] rev 3535
cleanup: remove duplicate import of "obsolete"
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:21:05 +0530 previous: fix behavior on obsolete cset when topic is involved (issue5708) stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:21:05 +0530] rev 3534
previous: fix behavior on obsolete cset when topic is involved (issue5708) This patch fixes the behavior of `hg previous` when done on an obsolete changeset having a successor of different topic. The underlying code is bit messed up, I wanted to split the topic handling to topic extension but I have postponed it to next bug.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:15:17 +0530 previous: add test case when it's broken on obsolete cset stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:15:17 +0530] rev 3533
previous: add test case when it's broken on obsolete cset This patch adds couple of tests showing `hg previous` is broken on obsolete changeset when the successor has different topic. Upcoming patch will fix this.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:01:44 +0530 prev: fix the breakage of `hg previous` from obsolete cset stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 15:01:44 +0530] rev 3532
prev: fix the breakage of `hg previous` from obsolete cset This patch fix the breakage of `hg prev` from obsolete changeset when topic is involved. We get the topicidx of it's succesor and proceed.
Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:59:10 +0530 prev: add a test case which shows traceback when doing prev on obsolete cset stable
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Fri, 16 Mar 2018 14:59:10 +0530] rev 3531
prev: add a test case which shows traceback when doing prev on obsolete cset This patch adds a test which shows how `hg prev` is borken when called from a obsolete changeset and there is an active topic. The next patch will fix that.
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:06:14 +0530 tests: add more tests related to stabilization of orphaned merge commit
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 19:06:14 +0530] rev 3530
tests: add more tests related to stabilization of orphaned merge commit This patch more tests related to stabilization of orphaned merge commit. Stabilization of a merge changeset with both the parents is not supported right now and prints a message on how to do that. Maybe we should do that internally as a part of `hg evolve` but I need to think about this.
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:17:50 +0530 evolve: fix stabilization of orphan merge changesets in case of conflicts
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 18:17:50 +0530] rev 3529
evolve: fix stabilization of orphan merge changesets in case of conflicts As demonstrated by tests added in previous patch, if one of the parent of a merge changeset has a new version and merge changeset gets, running `hg evolve` to stabilize that if results in conflicts will lead to lose of other parent of that merge changeset when we resolve conflicts and do `hg evolve --continue`. This patch fixes the behavior, by checking whether we are continuing evolving a merge changeset and if yes, setting the dirstate parents according to that.
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:29:35 +0530 tests: add a test file of resolving orphaness of merge changesets
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 15:29:35 +0530] rev 3528
tests: add a test file of resolving orphaness of merge changesets This patch adds a new test file named test-evolve-orphan-merge.t which contains test cases when `hg evolve` try to stabilize a merge changeset which was orphan. This file contains 20-30% of all the cases as we have got something to fix before we add tests for rest of the cases. Going by this approach will make sure we don't live unfixed cases in the test file and the test files does not become a pile of hacks which are used to get in state when we fix the bugs.
Tue, 13 Mar 2018 20:44:51 +0530 grab: gracefully handle the case when we try to grab parent of wdir
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Tue, 13 Mar 2018 20:44:51 +0530] rev 3527
grab: gracefully handle the case when we try to grab parent of wdir Before this patch, we go all the way down to obsmarker creation logic and gets an error saying that changeset cannot obsolete itself. We should be more smart here and error out early saying we cannot grab that changeset.
Sat, 03 Mar 2018 23:31:46 +0530 grab: move the initialization of pctx variable outside of if-else
Pulkit Goyal <7895pulkit@gmail.com> [Sat, 03 Mar 2018 23:31:46 +0530] rev 3526
grab: move the initialization of pctx variable outside of if-else The pctx variable is used outside of the if-else but it was initialized under the conditional statements. Added test for the case when the initialization inside the if-else broke `hg grab --continue`.
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -50 -28 +28 +50 +100 +300 +1000 tip