prune: remove a list of bookmarks Currently prune works with a single bookmark, the changes in this patch modifies the prune module to work with a list of bookmarks Building on this we can take a list of bookmarks as input and remove all of them in a single go

test: adapt to fix to "known" wireprotocol command Core fixed a bug in discovery (in b64b6fdc5c9b) and this is showing up in our test output.

evolve: renaming local variables Renaming local variables to be more precise, i want to store a different list of bookmarks(input-list) and it would be hard to understand what marks represents in that change therefore renaming it to repomarks. Renames mark to bookmark, which will make the changes in next patch more understandable, when it is pluraized. Also renames bookmarks (module) to bookmarksmod so as to free up the name when bookmark gets pluralized.

inhibit: backout 23a34dce5131 remove unused bookmark operation wrapping This breaks potentially a lot of things. Let's give a change to extensions maintainers to adapt to the new bookmarks.write api before removing this code right away.

readme: add something about bookmark within transaction

commitwrapper: use bookmarks.recordchange instead of bookmarks.write Before this patch we were using the deprecated API bookmarks.write, this patch replace its usage by the new API call bookmarks.recordchange.

next: replace call to bookmarks.write by bookmarks.recordchange bookmarks.write is now deprecated, we are moving to the new api: bookmarks.recordchange.

previous: replace call to bookmarks.write by bookmarks.recordchange bookmarks.write is now deprecated, we are moving to the new api: bookmarks.recordchange.

prune: use bookmarks.recordchange instead of bookmarks.write Before this patch we were using the deprecated bookmarks.write instead of bookmarks.recordchange in prune

transaction: fix release order in 'rewrite' This was wrong for quite sometime.

check-code: make drophack comply with check-code

check-code: make directaccess.py comply with check-code

check-code: make inhibit.py comply with check-code

check-code: make obsolete.py comply with check-code

check-code: make pushexperiment.py comply with check-code

check-code: make simple4server.py comply with check-code

check-code: make evolve.py comply with check-code

evolve: fix test-inhibit to match latest hg When I fixed an issue in core about rebaseset 40a2f972f26d (that I introduced before), it restored the original behavior of inhibit with rebase. This patch fixes test-inhibit to match the latest hg.

evolve: fix test-stabilize-conflict.t to match new extra computation in core Recent patches changed the way we compute extras for rebase and graft. This changes the hashes in evolve's tests. This patch fixes the test test-stabilize-conflict.t.

evolve: fix test-sharing.t to match new extra computation in core Recent patches changed the way we compute extras for rebase and graft. This changes the hashes in evolve's tests. This patch fixes the test test-sharing.t

evolve: fix test-tutorial.t to match new extra computation in core Recent patches changed the way we compute extras for rebase and graft. This changes the hashes in evolve's tests. This patch fixes the test test-tutorial.t

inhibit: make rebase see obsolescence even for visible nodes Rebase changed recently to take advantage of obsolescence markers to reduce the number of conflicts to resolve. Inhibit users were unable to leverage this new feature because none of their visible nodes could be obsolete. This patch makes the nodes that would be obsolete without inhibit, actually obsolete for the duration of the rebase to take advantage of the feature mentioned before.

inhibit: remove unused bookmark operation wrapping Before this patch, inhibit was wrapping bookmarks.write and bookmarks.recordchange. Since all the usage of bookmarks.write are not replaced by bookmarks.recordchange all bookmarks operation happen in a transaction. Inhibit already wraps the transaction mechanism to make sure that no revision can end up being obsolete and visible. This makes the wrapping of bookmarks.write superfluous. Wrapping bookmarks.recordchange was wrong in the first place and redundant with wrapping transactions.

inhibit: update test with new behavior from core The recent changes in core (to make sure that all bookmarks write are done at the end of a transaction) changed the behavior of inhibit. When one rebases a set of hidden revs somewhere, the hidden revs become visible at the end of the rebase. Both the previous behavior and new behavior seems acceptable but the tests have to be changed subsequently. This patch modifies one of the test for inhibit when the case mentioned above happens. We prune the revs inhibited by the rebase to make the change minimal.

inhibit: remove unused import The error module from mercurial was imported but unused in the inhibit code.

inhibit: improve handling of error cases for bookmark -D Before this patch bookmark -D was crashing in some cases like: hg book -Dmaster-fix. This was because -m is a valid option for hg bookmark. This patch disallows using -m with -D (moving and pruning does not make much sense) and throws an error instead of crashing if the command is malformed.

directaccess: fix case of shortened hash containing only digits For directaccess, there are four cases for what looks like short hashes made of digits only: 1 | the hash is a revision number and not a short hash for another revision: we don't change the visibility 2 | the hash is a revision number and a short hash for another revision: we don't change the visibility 3 | the hash is not a revision number and not a short hash for another revision: we don't change the visibility 4 | the hash is not a revision number but is a short hash for another revision: we make it visible Before the patch we were not lifting visibility in case number 4. This patch fixes the issue.

evolve: evolve --divergent failed when merge had nothing to do (issue4950) Before this patch, if the divergence resolution lead to an empty commit, the transaction would be rolled back and the divergence not resolved. This patch allows empty commits in that case. It is legitimate to end up with an empty commit in that case, for example when divergent commits differ over their commit messages.