tests: add more test of --abort flag for content-divergence resolution This patch adds test when we resolve multiple content-divergence changesets at once and resolution fo first content-divergence does not form new commits, resolution of second one leads to conflicts. As the output shows, we are wrongly stripping a changeset here, which should be fixed in next patch.

evolve: prompt user for branch selection while resolving content-divergence When resolving content-divergence, there can be case when both the content-divergent changesets are on different named branches. In that case, we are not sure which branch should the resolution commit should be on. This patch adds logic to prompt user to choose the branch which the resolution commit should be on and then creates the new resolution commit on that branch. This also adds a new test file which have tests for the branch selection feature we have added.

evolve: pass the base revision in _completecontentdivergent() We need the base revision to merge commit messages, branches and more stuff. Let's make sure we have that by passing into the function which completes the divergence resolution.

evolve: store the base of content-divergents in evolvestate We need the base changeset for merging commit messages, branches. Let's store it in evolvestate.

evolve: use cmdrewrite.amend() instead of creating a new commit This patch backs out changeset 88601e1cd5d8. We replaced cmdrewrite.amend() with creating new commit because using amend(), a high level function was not good and creating a new commit gave us more control over things. **HOWEVER** to get more control, you need to get arrange all the pieces together perfectly. Creating a new commit, the existing logic has some bugs around dirstate handling, the `repo.dirstate.setparents()` call especially. Sometimes this fixes the dirstate correctly sometimes not. As Pierre-Yves David said, "Having a "clumsy" implementation with the right behavior is usually a good first step. So having an amend based implementation seems like a good first step.", let's take a step back and get back using amend so that we can have a correct basic implementation which is bug free.

corecompat: update the tests output to show phase update summary eb9835014d20 in core added support to transactions to show a summary on the phase changed during that transaction. Due to this, couple of tests output needs to be updated. This patch does that. While realeasing evolve, this patch should be backed out on branches where hg<=4.6. CORE-TEST-OUTPUT-UPDATE: eb9835014d20

CHANGELOG: add an entry about issue 5808 being fixed

next-prev: replace the error hint to mention about `--merge` flag

tests: add tests for conflicts while respecting commands.update.check This patch adds tests to check that we don't run into conflicts while respecting commands.update.check. The error message now does not show the hint about --merge option which we should fix.

next: respect `commands.update.check` config option in `hg next` (issue5808) `commands.update.check` config option determines what level of checking should be done when we update to another revision. When we set this config option to `noconflict`, it updates your working directory to a specified revision only when there will be no conflicts which is a very nice behavior. This patch adds logic to respect the config option so that we can have that nice behavior with `hg next` too. It turns out, we just needed to use hg.updatetotally() and add some cases to check config option. Right now, we only respect the config if value is set to `noconflict`. Otherwise we fallback to the default behavior. This is a part of fixing issue5808. Test changes demonstrate the fix.

prev: respect `commands.update.check` config option in `hg prev` (issue5808) `commands.update.check` config option determines what level of checking should be done when we update to another revision. When we set this config option to `noconflict`, it updates your working directory to a specified revision only when there will be no conflicts which is a very nice behavior. This patch adds logic to respect the config option so that we can have that nice behavior with `hg prev` too. It turns out, we just needed to use hg.updatetotally() and add some cases to check config option. Right now, we only respect the config if value is set to `noconflict`. Otherwise we fallback to the default behavior. This is a part of fixing issue5808. Test changes demonstrate the fix.

tests: add test demonstrating issue5808 This patch adds test showing that `next` and `prev` does not respect the `commands.update.check` config option, particularly when set to `noconflict`.

next: bail out early in `hg next --evolve` if dirty wdir This patch adds logic to bail out early when --evolve is passed with next command and the working directory is dirty. This will help us in preventing the message saying `do you want --merge` which is useless and misleading when `--evolve` is passed.

tests: add test of `hg next --evolve` with dirty working directory I was testing some output change to `hg next --evolve` in dirty working directory and found that we don't have any test for that.