Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 12:30:15 +0100] rev 4422
branching: merge with stable
Pierre-Yves David <pierre-yves.david@octobus.net> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 11:54:49 +0100] rev 4421
changelog: add entries for the recent fixes
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 03:16:51 +0530] rev 4420
evolve: make sure user can recover from conflict (issue6053)
we make sure while continuing interrupted evolve it reach to right code
This patch fix the issue6053 which is about falling evolve into unrecoverable
state and this is how it call fall into it:
If after some rewrite operations we reach to a point where resparent for
two content divergent csets is obsolete and we hit a conflict in
relocation, so now if you run `hg evolve --continue` after resolving
the conflict: code execution would check if wdir parent is obsolete
and run solveobswdp() rather than going to continueevolve() part
and there we will hit by a "abort: outstanding uncommitted merge"
And same for `--abort` or `--stop` flags.
Changes in tests reflect the fixed behaviour.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Mon, 04 Mar 2019 02:55:38 +0530] rev 4419
evolve: add test which shows unrecoverable evolve state (issue6053)
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Sat, 02 Mar 2019 02:34:29 +0530] rev 4418
evolve: add a test in pubdiv where only merging leads to conflict
Added a test in public divergence where both the cset are on the different
parent and no conflict in relocation but in merging.
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Thu, 28 Feb 2019 03:12:39 +0530] rev 4417
evolve: cover continue case in pubdiv when merging results in same as public
This patch is the part of a series which is adding support of public
divergence resolution of the case when merging results in same as pubic
cset. Changes made in this patch cover the --continue flag for the case:
when we had conflicts in merging.
Modified lines in previously added tests reflects the changed behaviour.
Also added some additional tests. I guess I have covered every possbile
case in test-evolve-public-content-divergent.t
While reviewing, if you see any test missed please let me know.
(I think there is one test missed that I will send as a follow-up)
Sushil khanchi <sushilkhanchi97@gmail.com> [Fri, 22 Feb 2019 01:02:51 +0530] rev 4416
evolve: handle a case in pubic-div when merging results in same as public
In public divergence resolution, what we do is:
1) first apply content divergence resolution
2) then phase divergent resolution on resultant node of 1) case
While doing case 1 it is possible that result of merging the two csets
would have same changes as public one contains. And then processing
the case 2 would create an empty commit which is not something we want
to do.
So this patch catch that same case when merging results in same as public
cset and don't create a new node, instead to solve the divergence
it just add a obsmarker from "other divergent" to "public divergent"
i.e. [other, (public,)]
Next patch will add the continue case handling for this same case.
This patch also adds the tests for the different cases which are possible
for the above mentioned case.
There is test for continue case too which is broken in this patch
and will be fixed in next patch.